What is in a vaccine?

Vaccine adjuvants, their role, and risk mitigation if you spill such substances on your skin or elsewhere

© Colleen Huber, NMD

Adjuvants are substances that have been added to vaccines for about a century, and that are present in every vaccine that is commercially produced.  Their alleged purpose is to enhance the immune response.  Adjuvant is from the Latin adjuvare (to aid).  In fact, they are substances that are each documented in chemical industry literature to have shown concerning effects on exposure.  The standard toxicology reference documents in the chemical industry are the Oxford Materials Safety Data Sheets, and I reference those in the tables below.

Why would known poisons be added to vaccines?  One may speculate on a variety of motives for their presence, but the official explanation is basically this: 

The mechanism of adding a small amount of a poison to a tool that is hoped to stimulate immune function is that by means of some cell death, metabolic disruption and / or tissue damage, the whole immune system is placed on high alert to muster its forces to wage war against the new crisis: the new poison introduced by breach of skin and mucous membrane armor.

Table 1 shows the adjuvants that are currently used in common childhood vaccines, as well as the remedial measures advised when individuals are exposed to the same substances.

Tromethamine (or “Tris”) reduces acid levels in the body following heart surgery or cardiac arrest.  Now why would such a substance need to be added to the COVID vaccine?  Could it be that a new epidemic of heart disease is being caused by these vaccines in the older age groups?  Indeed, we are seeing increased hospitalization around the world, only partially but not mostly attributed to COVID, since widespread COVID vaccine distribution.

Tromethamine’s adverse events, as listed by Drugs.com, include respiratory depression, tissue inflammation and liver damage (hepatocellular necrosis), which are definitely some outcomes that sane people would never risk in order to “protect” a child, or adult for that matter, from a variant of the common cold.

The adjuvant substances listed in the tables above should give rise to concern among the public and the health care professions regarding their use, and should draw particular attention to the requirement for informed consent, as mandated under the Code of Federal Regulations: 45 CFR § 46.116, particularly Sections (a), (b), with particular attention to (b) (8), (c) and (i).  [8]

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has been asked by the Biden Administration to force vaccination in US workplaces, first large and possibly small businesses also.   However, Congress established OSHA’s toxicology standard, as upheld by the Supreme Court, to be: “Standard which most adequately assures, to the extent feasible, on the basis of best available evidence, that no employee will suffer material impairment of health or functional capacity even if such employee has regular exposure to the hazard dealt with by such a standard for the period of his working life.” [7]  The OSHA standards for chemical exposures then have been established as maximum permissible exposure to substances, not minimum permissible exposure.  For example, 10 ppm maximum exposure to benzene, not minimum exposure. This alone disqualifies OSHA from mandating the introduction of a new hazard that is not desired by either employer or employees.  And therefore, the Biden mandates are null and void, because they are pre-empted by existing laws and federal regulations regarding OSHA’s role in the workplace. Besides, there is no OSHA rule in place, nor federal law authorizing, the introduction by OSHA of known hazardous substances in the workplace.

Then there is the matter of the history of informed consent, the massively costly lesson of the Holocaust. Informed consent is our era’s strongest defense against fascism; it is the bulwark stipulation ensuring that medical procedures must never be forced on individuals, now enshrined in the Nuremberg Code, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Medical Declaration as well as United States law. Have the vaccinators in your midst ensured that your “refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled?” (Code of Federal Regulations) [8] Have the vaccinators in your midst acknowledged the experimental nature of the COVID vaccines, and that as the public participates in the Phase 3 trials of the COVID vaccines without being so informed, also contrary to informed consent law, the COVID vaccinated people are de facto research subjects?  Have the vaccinators in your midst made you aware of any of the above risk mitigation recommendations in the Oxford Materials Safety Data Sheets for the adjuvants they propose to inject into you and your child?

The adjuvant method of using a small dose poison to “aid” or to elicit a systemic reaction, although widely upheld as a necessary aspect of exemplary scientific practice by vaccine enthusiasts, has been widely and vehemently rejected when applied homeopathically, as for example when 18th century physician Samuel Hahnemann dosed himself orally with small doses of quinine from the bark of cinchona trees, which simulated malaria symptoms, and then seemed to have protective effect against malaria.   Since then, homeopaths have even treated their patients with minute (even below Avogadro’s number) amounts of arsenic, strychnine and other poisons, in order to alert the hypothalamus to restore homeostasis, to overcome symptoms and illness.  But homeopathy has never had lobbyists in the US Congress, so never mind about that.

A history of poisoning from a medical school toxicology textbook includes this:

“In the early Renaissance, the Italians . . . brought the art of poisoning to its zenith.  The poisoner became an integral part of the political scene.  The records of the city councils of Florence . . . contain ample testimony about the political use of poisons.  Victims were named, prices set, and contracts recorded; when the deed was accomplished, payment was made.”  [9]

---

[1] B Pulendran, P Arunachalam, D O’Hagan.  Emerging concepts in the science of vaccine adjuvants.  Nat Rev Drug Discov.  Apr 6 2021.  1-22.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023785/

[2] Oxford Materials Safety Data Sheets.  https://www.oxfordasd.org/domain/1183

[3] D Zhu, W Tuo.  QS-21: A potent vaccine adjuvant.  Nat Prod Chem Res.  Apr 2016.  3 (4): e113.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874334/

[4] K Wylon, S Dölle, M Worm.  Polyethylene glycol as a cause of anaphylaxis.  Allergy, Asthma & Clin Immun.  Dec 13 2016. 12 (67).  https://aacijournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13223-016-0172-7

[5] S Zhang, Y Xu, et al.  Cationic compounds used in lipoplexes and polyplexes for gene delivery.  J Controlled Release.  Nov 24 2004.  100 (2).  165 – 180.  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365904004006?via%3Dihub

[6] C Huber.  Area the COVID vaccines bio-weapons?  Aug 21 2021.  Substack. 

Are the COVID vaccines bio-weapons?

[7] W Thomas.  Supreme Court Review of the OSHA benzene standard.  36 (3) Part 2.  Taylor & Francis.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/2683839

[8] 45 CFR § 46.116 (b) (8).  Title 45: Public Welfare.  Subtitle A: Department of Health and Human Services.  Subchapter A: General Administration.  Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects.  Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School.  https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/46.116

[9] C Klaasen.  Casarett & Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons.  8th ed.  McGraw Hill. 2013.