Would you buy a used car from these companies?
People all over the world have been pressured to take COVID vaccines, before being informed of the manufacturers’ histories.
© Colleen Huber, NMD
Many people already know that in 2009 Pfizer paid the largest criminal fine in US history. This 2.3 billion fine was for health care fraud. Here is The Guardian’s reporting of the event. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/sep/02/pfizer-drugs-us-criminal-fine
Many people also learned recently that asbestos was used by Johnson & Johnson in baby powder for decades, an undisclosed toxin in widespread use all over the world. That Reuters story is here: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/johnsonandjohnson-cancer/
But what do we know of Moderna, a company that had never previously made a vaccine, nor even a product, as reported by Fortune in 2020? https://fortune.com/2020/11/19/moderna-vaccine-distribution-lonza-swiss/
Igor Chudov wrote about a patented cancer gene from 2017 that somehow ended up in the SARS-CoV-2 virus, despite a one in a trillion or so odds of that happening. The patent holder is Moderna.
And here is the patent:
And here is a link to the patent. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/01/6e/60/8951ab8f4118b5/US9587003.pdf
Notice that Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, is listed as the first inventor. At first, I wondered if Chudov could prove what he was writing, and I began to look for the genetic sequence in the fine print of the patent, but there were 100s of pages to sift through, so I set that homework aside.
Then, astonishingly, Bancel himself confessed to FOX that yes, this very event was possible. https://dcweekly.org/2022/03/02/moderna-ceo-admits-its-possible-that-the-vaccine-maker-patented-dna-three-years-before-the-pandemic-could-match-genetic-in-the-covid-19-virus/
So here are my questions:
1) As a naturopathic oncologist, I have worked with cancer patients for the last 15 years. All that time, I have used time-tested natural ingredients in IV nutrients, the ones we have known for many decades: vitamin C, B vitamins, minerals, and I explain how they work at length to patients and the public, both in my books and online and in the following documentary.
If I had done what Moderna did, if I came anywhere near - within miles of – inventing a pro-cancer gene, and then actually having the nerve to patent such a thing, do you think any cancer patient - or anyone else = would come within miles of me as a doctor ever again? And then if I “possibly” had something to do with that sequence of nucleotides finding its way into a virus in a bio-weapon lab, would any sane person come anywhere near even one item that I as a doctor offered? Would anyone buy so much as a used car from me? Cancer patients actually want to fight cancer, not visit with an oncogene maker. And not just a pro-cancer poison maker who would inject lab mice with such nastiness, but also to toss it into the human population via an engineered coronavirus? If, after all that, if I were then brazen enough to invent a vaccine, allegedly to solve the problem I created, would any sane or well-informed person trust me so much with that very first vaccine, that they would actually irreversibly inject such a wacko concoction with such a sinister history? Even writing the above paragraph, it looks to me more like the plot of an adventure novel than what could pass for actual current events among allegedly sane populations.
2) Considering Pfizer’s 2.3 billion dollar record-setting felony fine was for drug fraud, would any sane or knowledgeable person consider taking any drug that Pfizer made ever again? Much less an irreversible injection, where the ingredients have not been fully disclosed?
3) Considering that everyone knows how very deadly asbestos is, and its connection with mesothelioma, a brutal and suffocating cancer, would any sane or self-respecting person take a product - an injection no less! - made by a company that hid asbestos in an over-the-counter product for decades?
Well, so much for the COVID vaccines, which we know have negative efficacy and a horrific pattern of deaths and injuries, as I wrote about here,
and here
and here
and here:
For COVID prevention and treatment, that only leaves the early treatments that have been working successfully all over the world, such as in the meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials on nearly all continents. The most comprehensive information by far that I have seen on that is the tremendous body of data here.
My book The Defeat Of COVID explains how the best-performing and safest early treatments, namely vitamin D, zinc, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin work against COVID or any viral respiratory infection, and data showing how masks, lockdowns, and “testing” have not worked. I discuss the mechanisms of action of each of the above and address my writing to a broadly educated lay audience, because the more the public understands why some medical interventions are compatible with robust health, and some are not, the better decisions individuals and families will be equipped to make for their own health.
i don't think vitamin C gets enough attention as a treatment for viruses.
every time i get the sniffles i hit the liposomal variety hard (about a teaspoon every 2h) till i get better, this is usually about 12-15h.
i looked into this topic pretty deeply some years a go and the mechanism behind it is pretty simple, being an electron donor to keep cells healthy to killing viruses invitro.
the difficulty seems to be getting enough, yet pretty much no doctor or hospital has it on the list of treatments. Every person that visits a hospital with an illness will be low in vit c because the body will use all it can to fix you, but humans dont make their own unlike most animals
And don’t forget about the Bextra fraud judgement, and the special treatment Pfizer got. Read this story as well…
“Because any company convicted of a major health care fraud is automatically excluded from Medicare and Medicaid in the U.S. Convicting Pfizer on Bextra would prevent the company from billing federal health programs for any of its products. It would be a corporate death sentence.
Prosecutors said that excluding Pfizer would most likely lead to Pfizer’s collapse, with collateral consequences:
disrupting the flow of Pfizer products to Medicare and Medicaid recipients
causing the loss of jobs including those of Pfizer employees who were not involved in the fraud
causing significant losses for Pfizer shareholders.”
https://ethicalnag.org/2010/04/19/pfizer-bextra/