Are these the stats of a successful species? The UK reports 10 miscarriages for every normal pregnancy/birth in what appears to be Yellow Card data, on Gov.UK.
One eveninf over a game of bridge, I asked one player, a midwife if she had witnessed any unusual outcomes in the vaxxed women when she recently delivered babies. She answered very quickly and clearly “no”. I could not understand her response after reading articles of poor outcomes in childbirth for mum and baby recently. A few weeks later, after a trip to Australia, this same person coughed her way through our bridge game. When I asked her if she was unwell, she said “no”. When I asked her if there were many covid cases in Australia while she was there, again she answered “no”. Well guess what…a week later she wasn’t at bridge because she had covid. Cognitive dissonance seriously at work here.
When you play bridge with her again, ask her how many pregnant women were in Pfizer’s trials.
The answer is ZERO. They used 42 rats, never observed their offspring past birth and then claimed, “safe and effective.” That’s the status of medical care.
I hear it too, from my doctor. When I got Covid (delta) I was out of state. I was visiting my sister in West Virginia. I refused remdesivir (I let her know it’s called RunDeathIsNear,) she seemed perplexed. Yes, I was hospitalized for a week and was given Olumiant instead. I don’t know if it helped, or just being on oxygen (oxygen was 87.) It took about a month to feel semi-normal. Still had to travel home with brain fog, oxygen at 91 in freezing temps, 1/2 way across the country, with a 3yro. My granddaughter who shared a bedroom with me, never caught a sniffle.
If the last two years have taught us anything it is to question every claim, every assumption and every premise. Simply believing what we have been told is how we got into this mess, and so it follows that the way out of it is to re-examine everything that we thought was a given.
It's the people who cannot get beyond their cognitive dissonance who are (in a practical sense) driving this health catastrophe forward.
To date 187 health agencies have admitted in writing (in response to FOIA requests) that they have no evidence of SARS CoV2 from any sick person anywhere. You can read all the responses here:
Alex “I Only Write The Truth” Berenson doesn’t seem to see any problems and says it is a bright spot …
“But we now have more than a year of detailed pregnancy data, and not just from the professional whitewashers at the Centers for Disease Control. And the numbers are among the few bright spots about mRNA shot safety. A huge British dataset shows no extra fetal deaths or severely low birthrates in women who received the shots - if anything, the numbers lean slightly in favor of the vaccines. Norway and Israel have had similar findings.“
Alex Berenson is a plant. He maintains all of the official narratives except whether the vaccines, masks and lockdowns are effective. He ridicules those who point out it's by design.
He does not even talk about adverse effects. With Taylor Hawkins, he posted an obviously manipulated NY Post "drugs found!" screenshot in a clear PR attempt to deflect from the vaccine.
He has attacked and tried to discredit people, including Robert Malone and Joe Rogan. He ridiculed ivermectin using the fraudulent Malaysian study, which is rigged to exclude zinc, and whose real results are the opposite of what is stated. He did the same with the NEJM study.
His book is to distract from RFK Jr's The Real Anthony Fauci. It explains away a globally coordinated genocide with malicious aforethought as if it's just a bunch of mediocre government officials grappling with complex problems. "If only we knew!" Haha. Nervous laughter.
He is a former New York Times reporter, which means basically an intelligence propagandist.
There are many like him, and the common thread is that they are official dissenters. Their role is to protect the mainstream narrative by capturing those who figured out one of the main tenets is a lie. They agree with you that yea, that one thing doesn't hold up - but the rest of the narrative is still true, honest! Surely you don't want to sound crazy - like one of those conspiracy fanatics?
Right, and then i find some folks in certain comment sections i won't name...
seem to just want to argue , but did agree with you about that one thing, like say, that the hacksxxxxines are obviously killer depopulation agenda and so why do i have to call it Big harma? Why i have to say Harmaceuticals are helping choke up killafornya all to death? why i can't speak NORMALy?
First they came for my grammar...
why do i call them hacksxxxxines? 4th booster, soon will be hacksxxxxxines, wow. 5th shot next...
i tried to apply for a crappy job i was really hoping to be able to get, but couldn't even walk thru their door. All the help was masked (though none of the patrons, ha, hard to eat with a mask on...) and they said i had to be hacksxxxxinated to walk in their door...
pity that sign ...
why i call it San Francisco killafornya
they killed the economy- Noconomy for two years, but they gave out plenty a needles in that time, and fentanyl is really doing some bad deed around this clown town.
i'd not want to raise my kids here, had i any...
but a fine place for rats.
oh wait, funny that, no joke, they weren't content to depopulate the humans , they wanted to mess up all of womanity.
i heard last week, and saw in the Chronicle too, they done cleared out all but 16 of the 60 rats nests that had been targeted, as i recall, which they did by a multigenerational sterilizing agent in a sugar snack they provided them poor rats. God, i actually feel really bad for them rats, but worse for our own damm silly selvies
People, so ARrogant, the US of Arrogance, like we had to start a crappy war with Russia, hearing it will last 20-30 years (michael Hudson), oh that's great
and the rats are being poisoned, and the rat babies, but that poison was tested carefully to be safe and effective for the rest of the creatures, like, say , people living around the rats nests, and it was proven that the poison would not have any ill effect because we'd all already been injected with poison, their safety study showed...
ok, i made up that last bit,,, i didn't know how else to spit it out, clearly a bold faced lie, that was never even spoken, just passed off silently., why i had to voice it.
Berenson’s substack ( IMO ) is a grift. I rarely read it, not after his post about Ivermectin... the one where he butchered the trial findings to suit his personal bias against the drug. I can’t read him without getting angry. His substack has devolved into whining about his Twitter case, & soliciting money from his readers to pay his legal bills. I did glance at the post you describe. I was hopeful he might come to his senses, especially since the topic related to vaccines. I was nearly apoplectic reading his cavalier take. Odious.
Yes that’s why I linked it. Indeed, Alex “I Write the Truth” Berenson has lost his way. On Ivermectin. On being duped into thinking giant RCTs are the only valid evidence. On spending a lot of time thinking we give a shit about his Twitter case. And he has a horde of zealots reinforcing his bubble. He did a lot of good work early on for which I’m very grateful, but I’m still watching to see if he will return to doing good journalism for the people and not for some ego-based or self-interested agenda. (I think he actually wants to get back on Twitter.)
... and was wondering if you could shed light on it and how they can get away with saying that pregnant women are 15% LESS likely to have a still born? This next link is the study they provide to "prove their point", and as much as I'm in full on learning mode of the medical jargin language, studies and all, it's a little bit of a challange to be able to effective review that study and article.
It's obviously not true since I've sooooo much evidence to the contrary, but can you or someone more qualified than me comment? Thank you for your work :)
The Nature study is of abysmal quality. 90% of the reports were excluded without adequate explanation, and their data sources and calculations are not transparent. Typical COVID-era propaganda piece masquerading as science. So the Daily Mail ran with the memo.
Thank you. I could not have put it together like that. Facts are a wonderful thing as long as a person knows how to effectively repeat said truths. I do my small part but have to pull from those who are in the field on these subjects. Every learning and every grateful...
I totally agree. Their false fact checkers and covid agenda writers are almost comical to read once you know how things really work except it's not funny seeing how many of our brothers and sisters they are harming. There have been a few people qualified who pick apart those fictious articles saying how safe and effective the shots are, I was hoping someone would pick up on that one I posted and do the same. I'm all about learning both sides as much as possible to be able to more effectively combat what we know are total lies. Wisdom (truth of the matter) is key in combatting the falsehoods.
It's very dark. I go out for looong walks with my dogs... to get out of this world... I mean long. And then he protests 3x before getting in car. Only normal person I run into!
When you use only 42 rats without any observation of the offspring. Then claim “safe and effective,” for pregnant women and their offspring, you should be sued. I’m more for suing and seeing these doctors resign, licenses forfeited and never practice medicine again, I’m good with that.
I wonder if this information in the suppressed psyche is part of probable Roe overturn?
I think that might be the only remaining significant thing I am "left" leaning about, though there must be more.
In the same way we should NOT be getting hacksxxxines I feel women must be able to choose abortion in demand freely and safely. Hopefully with the agreement of the father when appropriate, but not always in actual reality. it must always be a woman's right to choose . No one gets one as a pleasurable experience, the reality sadly lost in the theoreticals.
Now that we've started world war 3,
We'll need to have all the babies we can....
And I wish and hope and pray they'll end these hacksxxxines
There are many articles I'd read but for the paywall of China epoch
There was a day during the peak of the vaccine roll out when 18 babies were still born at the Lions Gate hospital in Vancouver Canada. This was in the summer of 2021. One doctor blew the whistle and promptly was maligned and called a liar. I have been waiting for something to come out about this. Have you or anyone reading heard of this?
Yes, it was Dr Daniel Nagase and Dr Mel Bruchet. I couldn’t find the older stuff on that whistleblower story from earlier in year but I found this. I have NOT vetted this video yet more just posting as a reference.
I am confused. When I downloaded the pdfs, it says these are adverse reports from the Yellow Card system? Is that right? Then there really wouldn't be a healthy pregnancy comparator, because these are only voluntary reports, probably made because something bad happened. If nothing bad happened, they wouldn't really report, would they? Then, amongst people reporting adverse events, pregnancy outcomes were extremely poor. It would be unknown how things look for those who didn't decide to make a report, whether because they didn't think to do it, or didn't think any bad event was related, or didn't have a bad event to report. Did I get this wrong?
I think that is an excellent point. However, when I see morning sickness, which is more common than not in pregnancy, as well as the various circumstances of normal birth and delivery reported, there are circumstances other than the most dire that are recorded. No pregnancy is free of morning sickness or other common ailments.
Would you say that this data is skewed due to reporting biases and tendencies? That would definitely be a problem for assessing any voluntary post-medication reporting system, whether a voluntary system such as VAERS or Yellow Card, or a more tightly organized clinical study.
I guess it seems like it is hard to pick out a true comparison of negative pregnancy effects vs normal pregnancies where the baby is at least apparently OK. I've spent some time looking at VAERS reports, but not Yellow Card. In VAERS, for example, if someone reports one effect, whether minor or big, there is sometimes much more information included. So, in theory, a swollen arm report could include pregnancy information. Some of the reports are very thorough. Some are quite sparse on details. VAERS represents the perfect dead end safety monitoring because there will always be this problem of not being able to resolve some serious unknowns. Ideally, you would follow all of the pregnant women who got the shot and find out what happens. The Yellow Card citation that you based this story on does not do anything like that. The closest was the V Safe pregnancy subset, but it is still a voluntary participation by the women, and I don't know how well it represents the overall demographic of those who took the shot. And there are even the confounding unknowns, like, women being told that their pregnancy issues couldn't possibly have anything to do with the shot. I personally know two people who lost their babies after the shot, and it is absolutely a huge social trigger to in any way connect it to the shot.
The V Safe data on pregnancies that has been released looks pretty bad to my eyes, but CDC labeling it as "normal" has effectively calmed concerns of the injection faithful, despite being able to look at something real.
In terms of your article, I was disappointed to discover that it was based on Yellow Card. I also think it is verging upon being unethical, or at least, an important oversight, that you did not prominently mention that it is from Yellow Card, and noting that this means we have no idea from this data what a comparison between negative pregnancy outcomes and "normal" might be. I had to open up the linked pdfs and see if in tiny print on the top.
The reason I point this out is not to discount the safety issues raised by these Yellow Cards reports. I bring this up because, if I have a very tiny window to speak to my friends and family about that shot before they flip out that I would ever criticize it, I cannot present your cited information in the way that you did. If they, hopefully, spend time following up on it, they will determine that I misrepresented it to them. I will lose credibility and lose even more my potential to have openness to consider the harms of the shot.
I did try to talk about the V Safe data with people I know. I spent a lot of time analyzing why it is very disturbing, why the CDC falsely represented it as evidence of safety and manipulated the presentation of the data. I ended up with people pissed off at me, mostly because, who am I to say anything about the CDC. When I first saw your article, I was excited because it seemed to be a more straightforward and obvious evidence of harm, but when I saw it was Yellow Card, I realized that I can only honestly share it by presenting it as such. I think, for those reporting systems like VAERS and Yellow Card, it is much more compelling to examine specific reports. When you hear the specific stories, to me it seems hard to ignore these real stories where it is much more difficult to call it a fluke. For example, the baby was healthy and moving, and then the baby was harmed such that any normal person will say that it appears to have been the shot.
So far, this is where I am at with the information you presented, with what I think I understand so far. Maybe I didn't think of something important, so I would want to hear that. I personally would want the article to say very upfront that it is from Yellow Card, because it would be very important to me for interpreting and sharing the information.
Thank you for working on this. I will try to understand anyone's thoughts on this.
I see your point. There is no value at all in sacrificing perceived credibility to try to bolster one's argument. My confusion about Yellow Card is that I thought it was a reporting system similar to VAERS, but with the difference that NHS socialized medicine requesting or requiring all obstetricians reporting all post-vax circumstances to Yellow Card, including benign. Hence, the reports of normal pregnancy, normal birth, etc., which we do not see in VAERS. But perhaps that is not the case? At any rate, to address your concern, I am putting in the sub-heading now, and near top of article that this data appears to be from Yellow Card directly (although that is not clear either.) Also, I cannot find further background or explanation for these documents on a Google search, only the documents themselves.
And FYI, I don't have any credibility in my family. They get turned off before they get started because they do Fact Check searches so they won't have to figure it out themselves nor actually spend time with what I bring up. But, they are the only family I have. So, I try to keep amassing research and I end up reading everything with an eye to whether it could possibly be something they would even look at, and what the experience of investigating it would be like for them, were they to possibly investigate, with the parameters for credibility that they have for themselves. Unfortunately, the biggest parameter for credibility is for the general media, officials, and society to accept something as true, and that is something that feels out of control. I still wish everyone would spend time investigating everything and have real critical inquiry. I am also hoping to up the atmosphere of openness that there are a lot of people who are not with the official program. It needs to be acceptable and socially normal to think differently than whatever is officially proclaimed.
Completely agreed, and you do me an enormous favor holding me to account. I look through what I write for mistakes, sloppiness, inadequate disclosure, overlooked but important factors. You helped me find an important one. Thank you so much!
Thank you! I don't know as much about Yellow Card and whether the culture of reporting is as subpar there as it is in the US. There may be some useful differences. I just don't know.
These monsters knew about all these possible outcomes and could care less. Someday there will be a huge battle against these Lizard people---putting it off is only going to cause more unnecessary death.
Thanks for this info. More on this topic welcome, and best of luck on the book. Slightly OT, the new Van Morrison LP, What's It Gonna Take? will be out soon. I have an essay about it's first song, "Pretending," over at PostModernConservative. https://pomocon.substack.com/p/carls-rock-songbook-no-128-van-morrison?s=w
One eveninf over a game of bridge, I asked one player, a midwife if she had witnessed any unusual outcomes in the vaxxed women when she recently delivered babies. She answered very quickly and clearly “no”. I could not understand her response after reading articles of poor outcomes in childbirth for mum and baby recently. A few weeks later, after a trip to Australia, this same person coughed her way through our bridge game. When I asked her if she was unwell, she said “no”. When I asked her if there were many covid cases in Australia while she was there, again she answered “no”. Well guess what…a week later she wasn’t at bridge because she had covid. Cognitive dissonance seriously at work here.
When you play bridge with her again, ask her how many pregnant women were in Pfizer’s trials.
The answer is ZERO. They used 42 rats, never observed their offspring past birth and then claimed, “safe and effective.” That’s the status of medical care.
Andrea, misinformation kills is by doctor who believes in Pfizer. You should challenge her.
I have and will but you're good.
I hear it too, from my doctor. When I got Covid (delta) I was out of state. I was visiting my sister in West Virginia. I refused remdesivir (I let her know it’s called RunDeathIsNear,) she seemed perplexed. Yes, I was hospitalized for a week and was given Olumiant instead. I don’t know if it helped, or just being on oxygen (oxygen was 87.) It took about a month to feel semi-normal. Still had to travel home with brain fog, oxygen at 91 in freezing temps, 1/2 way across the country, with a 3yro. My granddaughter who shared a bedroom with me, never caught a sniffle.
hmm…
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-politics-of-medical-gaslighting
The whole series of articles is a must read.
We are waiting on the last one now!
Nothing that a few more booster won't solve. Sigh (Sarcasm)
Or a liar
"Cognitive dissonance seriously at work here."
If the last two years have taught us anything it is to question every claim, every assumption and every premise. Simply believing what we have been told is how we got into this mess, and so it follows that the way out of it is to re-examine everything that we thought was a given.
It's the people who cannot get beyond their cognitive dissonance who are (in a practical sense) driving this health catastrophe forward.
To date 187 health agencies have admitted in writing (in response to FOIA requests) that they have no evidence of SARS CoV2 from any sick person anywhere. You can read all the responses here:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Alex “I Only Write The Truth” Berenson doesn’t seem to see any problems and says it is a bright spot …
“But we now have more than a year of detailed pregnancy data, and not just from the professional whitewashers at the Centers for Disease Control. And the numbers are among the few bright spots about mRNA shot safety. A huge British dataset shows no extra fetal deaths or severely low birthrates in women who received the shots - if anything, the numbers lean slightly in favor of the vaccines. Norway and Israel have had similar findings.“
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/a-lot-of-you-have-asked-about-the
I stopped reading a b after didn't he badmouth Malone? Several ways till tomorrow...
Also I don't read folks when I can't stand their snivelling tone like they are smacking me while I read...
I don't think a b offers any more value for your eyeball time than the substack that is mine...
I feel the writing ought to be sacred, eh?
Alex Berenson is a plant. He maintains all of the official narratives except whether the vaccines, masks and lockdowns are effective. He ridicules those who point out it's by design.
He does not even talk about adverse effects. With Taylor Hawkins, he posted an obviously manipulated NY Post "drugs found!" screenshot in a clear PR attempt to deflect from the vaccine.
He has attacked and tried to discredit people, including Robert Malone and Joe Rogan. He ridiculed ivermectin using the fraudulent Malaysian study, which is rigged to exclude zinc, and whose real results are the opposite of what is stated. He did the same with the NEJM study.
His book is to distract from RFK Jr's The Real Anthony Fauci. It explains away a globally coordinated genocide with malicious aforethought as if it's just a bunch of mediocre government officials grappling with complex problems. "If only we knew!" Haha. Nervous laughter.
He is a former New York Times reporter, which means basically an intelligence propagandist.
There are many like him, and the common thread is that they are official dissenters. Their role is to protect the mainstream narrative by capturing those who figured out one of the main tenets is a lie. They agree with you that yea, that one thing doesn't hold up - but the rest of the narrative is still true, honest! Surely you don't want to sound crazy - like one of those conspiracy fanatics?
Right, and then i find some folks in certain comment sections i won't name...
seem to just want to argue , but did agree with you about that one thing, like say, that the hacksxxxxines are obviously killer depopulation agenda and so why do i have to call it Big harma? Why i have to say Harmaceuticals are helping choke up killafornya all to death? why i can't speak NORMALy?
First they came for my grammar...
why do i call them hacksxxxxines? 4th booster, soon will be hacksxxxxxines, wow. 5th shot next...
i tried to apply for a crappy job i was really hoping to be able to get, but couldn't even walk thru their door. All the help was masked (though none of the patrons, ha, hard to eat with a mask on...) and they said i had to be hacksxxxxinated to walk in their door...
pity that sign ...
why i call it San Francisco killafornya
they killed the economy- Noconomy for two years, but they gave out plenty a needles in that time, and fentanyl is really doing some bad deed around this clown town.
i'd not want to raise my kids here, had i any...
but a fine place for rats.
oh wait, funny that, no joke, they weren't content to depopulate the humans , they wanted to mess up all of womanity.
i heard last week, and saw in the Chronicle too, they done cleared out all but 16 of the 60 rats nests that had been targeted, as i recall, which they did by a multigenerational sterilizing agent in a sugar snack they provided them poor rats. God, i actually feel really bad for them rats, but worse for our own damm silly selvies
People, so ARrogant, the US of Arrogance, like we had to start a crappy war with Russia, hearing it will last 20-30 years (michael Hudson), oh that's great
and the rats are being poisoned, and the rat babies, but that poison was tested carefully to be safe and effective for the rest of the creatures, like, say , people living around the rats nests, and it was proven that the poison would not have any ill effect because we'd all already been injected with poison, their safety study showed...
ok, i made up that last bit,,, i didn't know how else to spit it out, clearly a bold faced lie, that was never even spoken, just passed off silently., why i had to voice it.
Berenson’s substack ( IMO ) is a grift. I rarely read it, not after his post about Ivermectin... the one where he butchered the trial findings to suit his personal bias against the drug. I can’t read him without getting angry. His substack has devolved into whining about his Twitter case, & soliciting money from his readers to pay his legal bills. I did glance at the post you describe. I was hopeful he might come to his senses, especially since the topic related to vaccines. I was nearly apoplectic reading his cavalier take. Odious.
Yes that’s why I linked it. Indeed, Alex “I Write the Truth” Berenson has lost his way. On Ivermectin. On being duped into thinking giant RCTs are the only valid evidence. On spending a lot of time thinking we give a shit about his Twitter case. And he has a horde of zealots reinforcing his bubble. He did a lot of good work early on for which I’m very grateful, but I’m still watching to see if he will return to doing good journalism for the people and not for some ego-based or self-interested agenda. (I think he actually wants to get back on Twitter.)
So most of us on substack understand how many harms are coming from the covid shots. I ran across this link today...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10800761/Pregnant-women-Covid-jab-15-likely-suffer-stillbirth-reassuring-study-finds.html
... and was wondering if you could shed light on it and how they can get away with saying that pregnant women are 15% LESS likely to have a still born? This next link is the study they provide to "prove their point", and as much as I'm in full on learning mode of the medical jargin language, studies and all, it's a little bit of a challange to be able to effective review that study and article.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30052-w?utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=commission_junction&utm_campaign=CONR_PF018_ECOM_GL_PHSS_ALWYS_PRODUCT&utm_content=textlink&utm_term=PID100032693&CJEVENT=53e6c9dfd09411ec835dab2c0a1c0e13
It's obviously not true since I've sooooo much evidence to the contrary, but can you or someone more qualified than me comment? Thank you for your work :)
The Nature study is of abysmal quality. 90% of the reports were excluded without adequate explanation, and their data sources and calculations are not transparent. Typical COVID-era propaganda piece masquerading as science. So the Daily Mail ran with the memo.
Thank you. I could not have put it together like that. Facts are a wonderful thing as long as a person knows how to effectively repeat said truths. I do my small part but have to pull from those who are in the field on these subjects. Every learning and every grateful...
They have proved they can get away with almost anything they want.
A few ornery people are resisting.
There are very few Americans left.
I totally agree. Their false fact checkers and covid agenda writers are almost comical to read once you know how things really work except it's not funny seeing how many of our brothers and sisters they are harming. There have been a few people qualified who pick apart those fictious articles saying how safe and effective the shots are, I was hoping someone would pick up on that one I posted and do the same. I'm all about learning both sides as much as possible to be able to more effectively combat what we know are total lies. Wisdom (truth of the matter) is key in combatting the falsehoods.
It's very dark. I go out for looong walks with my dogs... to get out of this world... I mean long. And then he protests 3x before getting in car. Only normal person I run into!
When you use only 42 rats without any observation of the offspring. Then claim “safe and effective,” for pregnant women and their offspring, you should be sued. I’m more for suing and seeing these doctors resign, licenses forfeited and never practice medicine again, I’m good with that.
Thank you for your work Colleen.
I wonder if this information in the suppressed psyche is part of probable Roe overturn?
I think that might be the only remaining significant thing I am "left" leaning about, though there must be more.
In the same way we should NOT be getting hacksxxxines I feel women must be able to choose abortion in demand freely and safely. Hopefully with the agreement of the father when appropriate, but not always in actual reality. it must always be a woman's right to choose . No one gets one as a pleasurable experience, the reality sadly lost in the theoreticals.
Now that we've started world war 3,
We'll need to have all the babies we can....
And I wish and hope and pray they'll end these hacksxxxines
There are many articles I'd read but for the paywall of China epoch
Dodge paywalls with archive.ph
not super fast, but effective
There was a day during the peak of the vaccine roll out when 18 babies were still born at the Lions Gate hospital in Vancouver Canada. This was in the summer of 2021. One doctor blew the whistle and promptly was maligned and called a liar. I have been waiting for something to come out about this. Have you or anyone reading heard of this?
Read about it at the time
Where?
Globalresearch.ca is possible, or brownstone less likely,...
Was it in a substack from Jessica Rose? Or someone else?
I love how folks deny depopulation agenda...
Yes, it was Dr Daniel Nagase and Dr Mel Bruchet. I couldn’t find the older stuff on that whistleblower story from earlier in year but I found this. I have NOT vetted this video yet more just posting as a reference.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MgN0wLmnwzXY/
I am confused. When I downloaded the pdfs, it says these are adverse reports from the Yellow Card system? Is that right? Then there really wouldn't be a healthy pregnancy comparator, because these are only voluntary reports, probably made because something bad happened. If nothing bad happened, they wouldn't really report, would they? Then, amongst people reporting adverse events, pregnancy outcomes were extremely poor. It would be unknown how things look for those who didn't decide to make a report, whether because they didn't think to do it, or didn't think any bad event was related, or didn't have a bad event to report. Did I get this wrong?
I think that is an excellent point. However, when I see morning sickness, which is more common than not in pregnancy, as well as the various circumstances of normal birth and delivery reported, there are circumstances other than the most dire that are recorded. No pregnancy is free of morning sickness or other common ailments.
Would you say that this data is skewed due to reporting biases and tendencies? That would definitely be a problem for assessing any voluntary post-medication reporting system, whether a voluntary system such as VAERS or Yellow Card, or a more tightly organized clinical study.
I guess it seems like it is hard to pick out a true comparison of negative pregnancy effects vs normal pregnancies where the baby is at least apparently OK. I've spent some time looking at VAERS reports, but not Yellow Card. In VAERS, for example, if someone reports one effect, whether minor or big, there is sometimes much more information included. So, in theory, a swollen arm report could include pregnancy information. Some of the reports are very thorough. Some are quite sparse on details. VAERS represents the perfect dead end safety monitoring because there will always be this problem of not being able to resolve some serious unknowns. Ideally, you would follow all of the pregnant women who got the shot and find out what happens. The Yellow Card citation that you based this story on does not do anything like that. The closest was the V Safe pregnancy subset, but it is still a voluntary participation by the women, and I don't know how well it represents the overall demographic of those who took the shot. And there are even the confounding unknowns, like, women being told that their pregnancy issues couldn't possibly have anything to do with the shot. I personally know two people who lost their babies after the shot, and it is absolutely a huge social trigger to in any way connect it to the shot.
The V Safe data on pregnancies that has been released looks pretty bad to my eyes, but CDC labeling it as "normal" has effectively calmed concerns of the injection faithful, despite being able to look at something real.
In terms of your article, I was disappointed to discover that it was based on Yellow Card. I also think it is verging upon being unethical, or at least, an important oversight, that you did not prominently mention that it is from Yellow Card, and noting that this means we have no idea from this data what a comparison between negative pregnancy outcomes and "normal" might be. I had to open up the linked pdfs and see if in tiny print on the top.
The reason I point this out is not to discount the safety issues raised by these Yellow Cards reports. I bring this up because, if I have a very tiny window to speak to my friends and family about that shot before they flip out that I would ever criticize it, I cannot present your cited information in the way that you did. If they, hopefully, spend time following up on it, they will determine that I misrepresented it to them. I will lose credibility and lose even more my potential to have openness to consider the harms of the shot.
I did try to talk about the V Safe data with people I know. I spent a lot of time analyzing why it is very disturbing, why the CDC falsely represented it as evidence of safety and manipulated the presentation of the data. I ended up with people pissed off at me, mostly because, who am I to say anything about the CDC. When I first saw your article, I was excited because it seemed to be a more straightforward and obvious evidence of harm, but when I saw it was Yellow Card, I realized that I can only honestly share it by presenting it as such. I think, for those reporting systems like VAERS and Yellow Card, it is much more compelling to examine specific reports. When you hear the specific stories, to me it seems hard to ignore these real stories where it is much more difficult to call it a fluke. For example, the baby was healthy and moving, and then the baby was harmed such that any normal person will say that it appears to have been the shot.
So far, this is where I am at with the information you presented, with what I think I understand so far. Maybe I didn't think of something important, so I would want to hear that. I personally would want the article to say very upfront that it is from Yellow Card, because it would be very important to me for interpreting and sharing the information.
Thank you for working on this. I will try to understand anyone's thoughts on this.
I see your point. There is no value at all in sacrificing perceived credibility to try to bolster one's argument. My confusion about Yellow Card is that I thought it was a reporting system similar to VAERS, but with the difference that NHS socialized medicine requesting or requiring all obstetricians reporting all post-vax circumstances to Yellow Card, including benign. Hence, the reports of normal pregnancy, normal birth, etc., which we do not see in VAERS. But perhaps that is not the case? At any rate, to address your concern, I am putting in the sub-heading now, and near top of article that this data appears to be from Yellow Card directly (although that is not clear either.) Also, I cannot find further background or explanation for these documents on a Google search, only the documents themselves.
And FYI, I don't have any credibility in my family. They get turned off before they get started because they do Fact Check searches so they won't have to figure it out themselves nor actually spend time with what I bring up. But, they are the only family I have. So, I try to keep amassing research and I end up reading everything with an eye to whether it could possibly be something they would even look at, and what the experience of investigating it would be like for them, were they to possibly investigate, with the parameters for credibility that they have for themselves. Unfortunately, the biggest parameter for credibility is for the general media, officials, and society to accept something as true, and that is something that feels out of control. I still wish everyone would spend time investigating everything and have real critical inquiry. I am also hoping to up the atmosphere of openness that there are a lot of people who are not with the official program. It needs to be acceptable and socially normal to think differently than whatever is officially proclaimed.
Completely agreed, and you do me an enormous favor holding me to account. I look through what I write for mistakes, sloppiness, inadequate disclosure, overlooked but important factors. You helped me find an important one. Thank you so much!
Thank you! I don't know as much about Yellow Card and whether the culture of reporting is as subpar there as it is in the US. There may be some useful differences. I just don't know.
Here's some more interesting stats... https://rachelwild.substack.com/p/drug-recalls-in-the-uk-and-us-are?s=w
Attacking reproductive organs fits in with theory they want Georgia Guidestones.
Rise of transgender etc... also.
Drag queens reading to 1st graders?
They freaken hate us
These monsters knew about all these possible outcomes and could care less. Someday there will be a huge battle against these Lizard people---putting it off is only going to cause more unnecessary death.
I think you are insulting lizards but.... what do I know 🙄
Thanks for this info. More on this topic welcome, and best of luck on the book. Slightly OT, the new Van Morrison LP, What's It Gonna Take? will be out soon. I have an essay about it's first song, "Pretending," over at PostModernConservative. https://pomocon.substack.com/p/carls-rock-songbook-no-128-van-morrison?s=w