very interesting. The picture shows how hard labor does not harm, but indeed does a lot of good! May be we should get everyone to do some more garden work instead of sitting on the lawn mower then sitting on the sofa watching TV !
Colleen, I love your lactic acid theory! Makes sense. However, why are breast cancer cases increasing in the first place? I believe it boils down to light. All our cells use 2/3 light, and only 1/3 food as way to produce energy. Breasts are mostly fat as you know, and our photoreceptors (melanopsin) are buried in subcutaneous fat.
Melanopsins make MSH (melanocyte-stimulating hormone), which fight cancer. When women have their breasts covered, and not getting infrared light, they can't absorb UV, which builds our cancer-fighting powerhouse: melanin via MSH.
Sweat glands are also very sensitive (armpit region) to EMF via what are known as Brillouin precursors:
Interesting hypothesis. However, the chemical reactions that rely on equilibrium are in a beaker. And some reactions go until all the reagents are used up. Biologically, this reaction is catalyzed by an enzyme and so those rules don't apply. Could it be something as simple as lymphatic movement due to exercise?
If you haven't already seen this, it's definitely worth reading - the connection between root canals and breast cancer. The same pathogens that infect root canalled teeth and the underlying jaw tissue are often found within breast cancer tumors.
Thank you..! Fascinating, important, and once again proof that good rigorous exercise Rules... my daughters and my boys were taught early to get it on.. physical fitness is just an automatic daily must do, .. outside if possible. Took them on a lot of rock climbing, hiking, skiing, and surfing trips.. physically demanding but fun.. Student athletes always outperform.. 1 G now a Judge, 1 G a CLS, 1B small Biz owner, 1 B a COO of an International High rise builder.. all 4 fit.. sadly 2 are jabbed.. Could not dissuade them... such is life..
Thank you. I will add to my workout. Having had a baby very late in life, my breasts became and remain enormous and painful. Otherwise I’m pretty fit and active. Have not had a mammogram in 4 years since no longer a fan of “modern” medicine.
I read about breast pain/ fibrosis/ problems ... and taking extra iodine yesterday. Dr Ken Berry with Kelly hogan short yt video. Dr Elizabeth Bright is also a fan
Exercise and hydration go well together. Hydration equals salt plus water.
I don’t see cancer as a battle over an error made by dangerous cells that need correction via surgery, chemo or radiation.
I do think the nocebo effect of an asymptomatic diagnosis of breast cancer is real. I wonder at early detection (asymptomatic) and cancer treatments, are these women strong enough to make it through these treatment/torture options? And thus provide the cancer industry with more favourable statistics...
The body’s physiology is superb and cancer is an intelligent reaction to a toxin.
Dehydration is the curse that prevents a body from removing toxins.
Chronic dehydration due to salt restriction began in the 80s with the advice salt was bad for the heart.
When salt left the table, chronic dis-eases multiplied.
Women are built to carry extra fluid for growing and feeding a child so they require a lot more salt than men.
This is the reason dehydrated women’s breasts get lumpy.
Dementia is overly represented in women. A chronically dehydrated brain loses functionality.
Cystic fibrosis reveals the extensive list of symptoms that result from salt deficiency.
Hydration equals salt plus water.
You may be interested in reading my article
How does salt restriction lead to heart dis-ease and fear based reactionary thinking?
If lactic acid seeped into breast tissue as described, the fatty tissue would break down. Also, how does the lactic acid traverse the cell membrane of the pectoralis muscle and the fibrous layer of fascia between the muscle and the breast?
The upper and lower quadrant would be affected. Perhaps a factor related to the pressure, wicking, etc interact with one of the putative factors mentioned. An easy analysis would compare braless vs bra wearers. I believe that small breasted women are less likely to wear bras and less likely to develop breast cancer as well.
Good morning, Dr. Huber! Thank you for the time and effort you put into these postings, we appreciate it very much!
This is an interesting theory and one that needs to be explored further. Do you think you might conduct a study at the clinic? Anything that helps us get further away from the cut/poison/burn paradigm.
Mrs. "the Knife"
P.S. I had lunch with a friend yesterday who is receptive to reading your books on Covid and the jabs; I will be ordering the books today. I am proud of her - she has come a long from thinking that everyone should get jabbed to telling her GP last week "No more shots!"
Your articles are consistently amazing.
Wow, just. Wow.
very interesting. The picture shows how hard labor does not harm, but indeed does a lot of good! May be we should get everyone to do some more garden work instead of sitting on the lawn mower then sitting on the sofa watching TV !
Love this.
My dad always kept us to high protein low sugar/carbs growing up.. he was weight lifter 🏋️…
I went to intermittent fasting during Covid & my sugar cravings & intake have almost disappeared… and it’s very easy to follow forever 🙏
Colleen, I love your lactic acid theory! Makes sense. However, why are breast cancer cases increasing in the first place? I believe it boils down to light. All our cells use 2/3 light, and only 1/3 food as way to produce energy. Breasts are mostly fat as you know, and our photoreceptors (melanopsin) are buried in subcutaneous fat.
Melanopsins make MSH (melanocyte-stimulating hormone), which fight cancer. When women have their breasts covered, and not getting infrared light, they can't absorb UV, which builds our cancer-fighting powerhouse: melanin via MSH.
Sweat glands are also very sensitive (armpit region) to EMF via what are known as Brillouin precursors:
https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/breastimplants
@Dr. Colleen Huber
Interesting hypothesis. However, the chemical reactions that rely on equilibrium are in a beaker. And some reactions go until all the reagents are used up. Biologically, this reaction is catalyzed by an enzyme and so those rules don't apply. Could it be something as simple as lymphatic movement due to exercise?
Thank you Colleen for sharing this.
Women do less exercise now.
This makes sense, especially in overweight women that do not exercise their upper body because of the weight they carry.
The past 60 years of sugary fatty sweets has been an influence as well, I would guess
As always, a very interesting article. Thank you.
If you haven't already seen this, it's definitely worth reading - the connection between root canals and breast cancer. The same pathogens that infect root canalled teeth and the underlying jaw tissue are often found within breast cancer tumors.
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/breast-cancer?utm_medium=android
Thank you..! Fascinating, important, and once again proof that good rigorous exercise Rules... my daughters and my boys were taught early to get it on.. physical fitness is just an automatic daily must do, .. outside if possible. Took them on a lot of rock climbing, hiking, skiing, and surfing trips.. physically demanding but fun.. Student athletes always outperform.. 1 G now a Judge, 1 G a CLS, 1B small Biz owner, 1 B a COO of an International High rise builder.. all 4 fit.. sadly 2 are jabbed.. Could not dissuade them... such is life..
Going to do pec work more often now. It also makes breasts look perkier
Thank you. I will add to my workout. Having had a baby very late in life, my breasts became and remain enormous and painful. Otherwise I’m pretty fit and active. Have not had a mammogram in 4 years since no longer a fan of “modern” medicine.
I read about breast pain/ fibrosis/ problems ... and taking extra iodine yesterday. Dr Ken Berry with Kelly hogan short yt video. Dr Elizabeth Bright is also a fan
Exercise and hydration go well together. Hydration equals salt plus water.
I don’t see cancer as a battle over an error made by dangerous cells that need correction via surgery, chemo or radiation.
I do think the nocebo effect of an asymptomatic diagnosis of breast cancer is real. I wonder at early detection (asymptomatic) and cancer treatments, are these women strong enough to make it through these treatment/torture options? And thus provide the cancer industry with more favourable statistics...
The body’s physiology is superb and cancer is an intelligent reaction to a toxin.
Dehydration is the curse that prevents a body from removing toxins.
Chronic dehydration due to salt restriction began in the 80s with the advice salt was bad for the heart.
When salt left the table, chronic dis-eases multiplied.
Women are built to carry extra fluid for growing and feeding a child so they require a lot more salt than men.
This is the reason dehydrated women’s breasts get lumpy.
Dementia is overly represented in women. A chronically dehydrated brain loses functionality.
Cystic fibrosis reveals the extensive list of symptoms that result from salt deficiency.
Hydration equals salt plus water.
You may be interested in reading my article
How does salt restriction lead to heart dis-ease and fear based reactionary thinking?
https://jane333.substack.com/p/how-does-salt-restriction-lead-to
The role of the adrenals is paramount with chronic dehydration or hyponatremia.
Yeah. This is not a thing.
If lactic acid seeped into breast tissue as described, the fatty tissue would break down. Also, how does the lactic acid traverse the cell membrane of the pectoralis muscle and the fibrous layer of fascia between the muscle and the breast?
The easiest “exercise” would be to first stop vaccination.
The upper and lower quadrant would be affected. Perhaps a factor related to the pressure, wicking, etc interact with one of the putative factors mentioned. An easy analysis would compare braless vs bra wearers. I believe that small breasted women are less likely to wear bras and less likely to develop breast cancer as well.
Good morning, Dr. Huber! Thank you for the time and effort you put into these postings, we appreciate it very much!
This is an interesting theory and one that needs to be explored further. Do you think you might conduct a study at the clinic? Anything that helps us get further away from the cut/poison/burn paradigm.
Mrs. "the Knife"
P.S. I had lunch with a friend yesterday who is receptive to reading your books on Covid and the jabs; I will be ordering the books today. I am proud of her - she has come a long from thinking that everyone should get jabbed to telling her GP last week "No more shots!"
You are such a remarkable educator, doctor. Thank you for sharing your knowledge in such an easily comprehendible way. 🙏