COVID vaccines under scrutiny
The Bradford Hill criteria are the most widely accepted standards for assessing epidemiological causation. Let's examine how the COVID vaccines fare.
 |
A wide variety of human health events, that differed in incidence and prevalence from before, has been reported following administration of the COVID vaccines. Let’s apply Bradford Hill’s nine criteria one at a time, as follows, in order to see if a causal relationship between the COVID vaccines on the one hand, and increased injuries, infections and deaths on the other hand, is likely or not.
Great Reminder. More important, we shouldn't be experimenting on the public at large. These vaccines were developed using unproven technology, and without regard to the age-related threat profile of the virus that began becoming clear early on. Otherwise healthy people under 70 were never going to have much of a problem with the virus. Why we insist on uselessly subjecting youngsters to vaccines they don't need is fetishistic at best.
I knew, by looking only at data from earlier Coronavirus outbreaks, that case fatality rates would settle in around half a percent or less. Comorbidities would be important. I recommended safeguarding the geriatric, the fat and the immune-compromised. Leave everybody else alone pending more information. I was excoriated.
Other than a couple of Antifa members I managed to piss off, nobody minds today.
Love it.