Great Reminder. More important, we shouldn't be experimenting on the public at large. These vaccines were developed using unproven technology, and without regard to the age-related threat profile of the virus that began becoming clear early on. Otherwise healthy people under 70 were never going to have much of a problem with the virus. Why we insist on uselessly subjecting youngsters to vaccines they don't need is fetishistic at best.
I knew, by looking only at data from earlier Coronavirus outbreaks, that case fatality rates would settle in around half a percent or less. Comorbidities would be important. I recommended safeguarding the geriatric, the fat and the immune-compromised. Leave everybody else alone pending more information. I was excoriated.
Other than a couple of Antifa members I managed to piss off, nobody minds today.
When anyone asks me why I don't want the "vaccine", I share just two points: Experimental. And legal immunity for the companies pushing them. I am still *shocked* that so many people were willing to be experimented on (not to mention experimenting on their children) for a "virus" with an over 99% survival rate for most healthy people (if symptoms ever even developed in the first place). There's a huge difference between taking something experimental for some kind of devastating cancer that a person is at stage 4 with and has a couple months to live and submitting to being a lab rat because we don't want to cough or have sniffles for a week.
Thank you. I just want to point out a typo in the para above footnote 41. In the high school groups, one of those should be unvaccinated versus vaccinated....
Great Reminder. More important, we shouldn't be experimenting on the public at large. These vaccines were developed using unproven technology, and without regard to the age-related threat profile of the virus that began becoming clear early on. Otherwise healthy people under 70 were never going to have much of a problem with the virus. Why we insist on uselessly subjecting youngsters to vaccines they don't need is fetishistic at best.
I knew, by looking only at data from earlier Coronavirus outbreaks, that case fatality rates would settle in around half a percent or less. Comorbidities would be important. I recommended safeguarding the geriatric, the fat and the immune-compromised. Leave everybody else alone pending more information. I was excoriated.
Other than a couple of Antifa members I managed to piss off, nobody minds today.
Love it.
When anyone asks me why I don't want the "vaccine", I share just two points: Experimental. And legal immunity for the companies pushing them. I am still *shocked* that so many people were willing to be experimented on (not to mention experimenting on their children) for a "virus" with an over 99% survival rate for most healthy people (if symptoms ever even developed in the first place). There's a huge difference between taking something experimental for some kind of devastating cancer that a person is at stage 4 with and has a couple months to live and submitting to being a lab rat because we don't want to cough or have sniffles for a week.
Thank you. I just want to point out a typo in the para above footnote 41. In the high school groups, one of those should be unvaccinated versus vaccinated....