Great Reminder. More important, we shouldn't be experimenting on the public at large. These vaccines were developed using unproven technology, and without regard to the age-related threat profile of the virus that began becoming clear early on. Otherwise healthy people under 70 were never going to have much of a problem with the virus. Why we insist on uselessly subjecting youngsters to vaccines they don't need is fetishistic at best.
I knew, by looking only at data from earlier Coronavirus outbreaks, that case fatality rates would settle in around half a percent or less. Comorbidities would be important. I recommended safeguarding the geriatric, the fat and the immune-compromised. Leave everybody else alone pending more information. I was excoriated.
Other than a couple of Antifa members I managed to piss off, nobody minds today.
When anyone asks me why I don't want the "vaccine", I share just two points: Experimental. And legal immunity for the companies pushing them. I am still *shocked* that so many people were willing to be experimented on (not to mention experimenting on their children) for a "virus" with an over 99% survival rate for most healthy people (if symptoms ever even developed in the first place). There's a huge difference between taking something experimental for some kind of devastating cancer that a person is at stage 4 with and has a couple months to live and submitting to being a lab rat because we don't want to cough or have sniffles for a week.
People have become so immune to the term ‘vaccine’ that they equate it with a term similar to ‘vitamin.’ Vaccines are good. Vaccines save lives. These phrases have been drummed into our collective consciousness to the point where if you speak out against any ‘vaccine’ then you must be against ‘good’ and ‘saving lives.’
Brilliant marketing, which is why they wanted these genetic therapies marketed as ‘vaccines.’ The marketing is lies, but they got a massive uptake in gene therapies which they never would’ve gotten without the past vaccine marketing and the current changing of the definition of a vaccine.
Thank you. I just want to point out a typo in the para above footnote 41. In the high school groups, one of those should be unvaccinated versus vaccinated....
Great Reminder. More important, we shouldn't be experimenting on the public at large. These vaccines were developed using unproven technology, and without regard to the age-related threat profile of the virus that began becoming clear early on. Otherwise healthy people under 70 were never going to have much of a problem with the virus. Why we insist on uselessly subjecting youngsters to vaccines they don't need is fetishistic at best.
I knew, by looking only at data from earlier Coronavirus outbreaks, that case fatality rates would settle in around half a percent or less. Comorbidities would be important. I recommended safeguarding the geriatric, the fat and the immune-compromised. Leave everybody else alone pending more information. I was excoriated.
Other than a couple of Antifa members I managed to piss off, nobody minds today.
Love it.
When anyone asks me why I don't want the "vaccine", I share just two points: Experimental. And legal immunity for the companies pushing them. I am still *shocked* that so many people were willing to be experimented on (not to mention experimenting on their children) for a "virus" with an over 99% survival rate for most healthy people (if symptoms ever even developed in the first place). There's a huge difference between taking something experimental for some kind of devastating cancer that a person is at stage 4 with and has a couple months to live and submitting to being a lab rat because we don't want to cough or have sniffles for a week.
I completely agree with you; however.
People have become so immune to the term ‘vaccine’ that they equate it with a term similar to ‘vitamin.’ Vaccines are good. Vaccines save lives. These phrases have been drummed into our collective consciousness to the point where if you speak out against any ‘vaccine’ then you must be against ‘good’ and ‘saving lives.’
Brilliant marketing, which is why they wanted these genetic therapies marketed as ‘vaccines.’ The marketing is lies, but they got a massive uptake in gene therapies which they never would’ve gotten without the past vaccine marketing and the current changing of the definition of a vaccine.
Thank you. I just want to point out a typo in the para above footnote 41. In the high school groups, one of those should be unvaccinated versus vaccinated....
Thank you! Getting on that now...