The following peer-reviewed paper may be found at Primary Doctor Medical Journal. Abstract This paper addresses the question of prevalence of COVID vaccine-associated myocarditis, as well as known mechanisms of spike protein-induced myocarditis, considering the epidemiological consequences of mass vaccination with spike protein-generating COVID vaccines, such as are being deployed throughout the world at present. The cardiac impacts of spike protein distribution have risen to particular concern, due to the recent extraordinary increase in new cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, including among populations that typically have vanishingly rare incidence of this disease, especially young men, with particularly anomalous occurrence in young male athletes.
I've read maybe 1500 or so papers on this subject, and this is the best paper I have come across in almost two years. Read it twice and will reread it a few times more. Beautifully written and fully referenced - worthy of an award - please follow through with journal publication. The medical/scientific community need more of this ...
There have been documented shedding of spike protein for weeks, even months. How is this possible if the mRNA enters the cytoplasm, causes the ribosomes to generate the spike protein and when the cell dies, no more spike protein? Theoretically you should have cascaded an
Immune response. So how is it possible to produce spike protein weeks or months later? The ONLY answer is that the mRNA through a reverse transcriptase pathway, inserts itself into the host genome. There the mRNA code will remain in perpetuity ostensibly. What will that do in the long run? Nobody knows.
Until we know what’s going on w the mRNA code (does anyone know where that code came from? It wasn’t a US or European lab) we should stop the jab immediately. The fact that there are several effective good treatments, makes any EUA illegal (see FDA rules for EUA)
William Waller, Jr MD
Regarding Dr. Huber's article: Execellent! It needs to be published!
I am once again struck by the similarities of the current COVID-19 fiasco and Gulf War 1 Syndrome we dealt with in the 90's. We found that Mycoplasma fermentans incognitus and vaccIna (smallpox vaccine) used as a bacterial and viral vectors genetically engineered to carry the gp-120env gene of HIV-1, producing the AIDS proteins allowing them to penetrate the host's cells. I have read at least 2 papers stating that the genome of the COVID-19 contains the same gene, gp-120env of HIV-1! Enabling it to produce HIV-1 proteins!
It's my understanding that both the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccine are utilizing m-RNA (incredibly with the gp-120env!) from the COVID-19! The Pfizer vaccine utilizes a viral vector containing the gp-120env! Shades of GWS PART 2?
Now consider the gp-120env given in the "vaccines" . Perhaps it is reasonable to assume these gp-120env genes can ALSO enter not only host cells via spike proteins, but certain normal flora organisms that inhabit all of our bodies! Seems that future complications from this are unknown and may be unlimited.
Ille Nigra Aries
They are now working on making the flu vaccines using the MRNA technology. I am very cautious about taking any vaccine nowadays! https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-a-new-mrna-based-flu-vaccine-may-be-the-most-effective-yet
Her book is excellent. Highly recommended!
Fantastic article thank you
This article appears to support the claim that the spike protein travels throughout the body:
"None of the new vaccines attempts to introduce the entire coronavirus into the body" Actually I believe the Sinovac vaccine that I had is a whole-virus vaccine? And yes, I had a racing heart, high blood pressure, very high pulse and chest pains for around 3 weeks, with clotting in my fingers and a transient stroke. So that wasn't nice either!
Hi there - Been part of the resistance since early 2021. Mid-2021 I came up with the label: "injectarian" to describe a friend of mine who was religiously devoted to the narrative. I understand your use of "covidian", but IMO it is too narrow and probably won't be as durable. Just started reading your content - great stuff. Thanks.
Thank you Dr. Huber. Clearly-written and brilliantly-summarized for the benefit of both laypeople and scientists. You deserve kudos and this article deserves to be promoted.
Thank you so much, so well written and explained.
I would like to add to my previous comments regarding Gulf War Syndrome/Illnesses. We diagnosed our sick veterans and family members via DNA-PCR
done by Dr Garth Nicholson of THE INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE in California. The Mycoplasma fermentans incognitus (a very small bacteria) had been bioengineered placing the gp-120env gene of HIV-1in the Mycoplasma genome. This enabled the Mycoplasma to produce the protein shell of HIV-1. Initially we treated patients with long intermittent courses of antibiotics usually doxycycline. Now obviously doxycycline is not useful in COVID-19, a virus. BUT don't change the channel! The story is about to get interesting! Another physician placed one of my GWS patient (my wife) on acyclovir for plastic surgery prophylaxis when she was also on doxycycline. The improvement was phenomenal! I immediately placed all my GWS patients on antivirals (acyclovir or famciclovir) with antibiotics. The results were very gratifying! Dr. Nicholson and I discussed the use of antivirals and agreed that the antivirals were thymidine kinase inhibitors, interfering with viral DNA replication, AND viral protein production (by the gp-120env gene of HIV-1) Since the
COVID-19 genome has been genetically engineered to contain the gp-120env gene to produce the HIV-1 proteins in the spikes, the same antivirals (acyclovir and famciclovir) MAY be quite useful for treatment/prophylaxis of COVID-19. Both drugs are inexpensive and safe for long-term treatment/suppression.
Does this mean that folks that got the more "traditional" (like Flu) Johnson and Johnson vaccine, do not have to worry about this?
Colleen, are we any closer to answers to these questions? I ask not just out of general curiosity, but out of concern for friends. If myocarditis is a problem for all ages who are vaxxed, how does a patient talk to a doctor about this or even determine whether it is worthy of broaching the topic with their physician? I play pickleball competitively. I live in a 55 plus community that has a 500+ club of pickleballers. I have noticed two things: 1) Many players who get the shot and then play soon after complain (even the men who rarely talk about pain) of serious fatigue and chest pain (or a bothered feeling in their chest) and sometimes they are having trouble catching their breath. These are new phenomena. When they complain about these things others who have experienced this with the vaccination tell them not to worry and that it will pass. So they have also experienced this. Because I have not been vaxxed it is hard to sound an alarm since their defaults are to not believe the vaccine is harmful in any way AND that anyone not vaccinated is an idiot on the topic of health.
Final question: should all people who are COV vaccinated inquire about getting tested for myocarditis? If not, is there a signal symptom to trigger an ask?
@ColleenHuberNMD I'm sympathetic to the concern the mRNA/spike protein spreads throughout the body and I find it scandalous more research hasn't been done. However when you say, "The spike proteins that are generated by the mRNA COVID vaccines are said to be identical to those attached to SARS-CoV-2," you use footnote 27 to back it up. This links to a study which right away in the abstract states the spike protein is, "...RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein." The key word here is prefusion, which means, unlike on the wild virus, the spike protein is modified so it can't change form and fuse into cells when it comes into contact with them, therefore it can't cause the damage you express concern about. This is the main argument of your opponents (https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-covid-19-vaccine-generated-spike-protein-is-safe-contrary-to-viral-claims, middle of page). What is your response to this? Like I said I'm interested in your argument and concerns, that's why I'm writing this, but you're going to have to persuade me on this point. This whole paper of yours hinges on the basis that the spike protein from the virus is no different than that produced by the vaccines. Thanks for taking the time to respond to this.