48 Comments

Every time I read an article like this, my blood begins to boil. When the truth comes out, what will be the punishment those who caused many thousands of people to die because they failed to try anything to treat the virus until people were gravely ill and hospitalized. Rather, they chose to be "accepted" by those that screamed really loud (main stream media, their peers, the social circles and the like minded political friends) that "It's about the SCIENCE". As with most illnesses, ordinary rational folks are pretty sure that key to stopping folks from getting really sick with early intervention. But with covid19, let's just wait and see and as I was told "call us if it gets worse." So, the real issue I have is why didn't the medical profession question the information being provided by the CDC, NIH and FDA back late last summer after several months of observation. Are there so few inquisitive folks in the medical profession or has the practice or medicine simply been reduced to do whatever the Ipad (populated by CDC, NIH, FDA and Big pharma guidance) says?

Expand full comment
Sep 9, 2021Liked by Dr. Colleen Huber

Since the CDC keeps changing the definition of a vaccine, does ivermectin now meet the latest definition?

Expand full comment

All of this propaganda against Ivermectin was well planned and known by the Big pHarma, I live on Reunion Island in the southern Indian Ocean, 500 miles east of Madagascar. Many people from here vacation in Madagascar and routinely purchase Ivermectin over the counter to take while in Madagascar. Well that was until January of 2020 when the French Health authorities decided that you must have a prescription to acquire it. I think it was not coincidental that this corresponded with the media blitz concerning novel covid-19.

It was being used in India against covid until the WHO came out against its use. The death rate in India skyrocketed and all of the main stream media was covering the deaths in India. A group of doctors and lawyers in India quickly filed a law suit and won and Ivermectin was allowed to be used again and the death rates plummeted, but no main stream media coverage. The mortality rate in Utta Pradesh is about 1.4% overall, and probably would be lower if ivermectin had been allowed continued use. Utta Pradesh has a population of about 240 million and a low vaccination rate and probably now a close to statistically 0 infection rate.

Expand full comment
Sep 9, 2021Liked by Dr. Colleen Huber

Another great piece of work Dr Huber. The Pasteur Institute came out against Ivermectin from a review published during July 2021, but they followed with an investigation using mouse models that was published during August -- they discovered in fact that Ivermectin protected the Olfactory and Respiratory systems (exactly what is needed for early onset treatment) and have now come out (tepidly) endorsing it. Credit to them for publishing truth.

Expand full comment

"Tokyo's Medical Assoc. Chairman holds live press conference recommending #ivermectin to all doctors, for all Covid patients. Japan's government is one of the most conservative and cautious in the world. Data is clear. Huge news." VIDEO: https://twitter.com/i/status/1429624844379824129

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2021Liked by Dr. Colleen Huber

Reading your blogs is like a breath of fresh air. Just simple truths and information to make decisions, without propaganda, bias or vested interests.

Expand full comment
Mar 19, 2023Liked by Dr. Colleen Huber

Hi Dr Huber, you shared this article recently on Dr Peter M’s article, and I’m wondering if you have seen success treating unvaccinated patients suffering from long Covid with Ivermectin or what do you recommend?

Expand full comment

"One concerning risk is that ivermectin is sold over the counter for veterinary use, and if people feel desperate to use it to ward off COVID-19, they might break off too large a piece from a large horse pill."

Pill sizes aside, is the ivermectin sold for veterinary use the same formulation as the human formulated ivermectin?

1) I see people on GAB etc claiming they are using the vet stuff - which I find concerning!

2) The protocols I have seen, e.g. prophylactic use etc, usually involve a larger initial dose, then a pill every 3-4 days BUT I don't know if people are properly following such protocols...

Expand full comment

It seems to me that people at the FDA cannot read, or rather, have their pockets wide open and their eyes closed.

Expand full comment

Now officially banned in Australia. If you're going to be wrong, may as well go all in.

Expand full comment

DR. Colleen Huber let us be Frank if I buy the packaged Ivermectin for my little 4 legged friend it still work on my favorite two legged mammal????

Expand full comment

Why is ivermectin $1 or more per pill here? I haven't even tried to get a prescrip, I simply ordered dog form from Ukraine back in the 'prohibition days' of the biden/faucxi regime's hitler era that continues. Everyone was so busy fighting and hating trump that they failed to realize they played right into the hands of the true tyrants! especially those too dumb to know they were getting injected with BS to enrich the SWAMP that trump was keeping at bay, he even kept the oil companies/countries in check and NO WARS. Biden etal with pharma are fools if you care to worship and follow that, you will be injured again and again believing that propaganda machine. Seek God wisdom if you care to find life.

Expand full comment

All I needed to hear was from the CDC/NIH and FDA that ivermectin didn’t work and then when the Left Wing Liberal Lame Main Stream Mockingbird Media Mob started making fun of it, I knew for sure it must be very effective against Covid and work very well! Sad that it has come to this in our world where all you have to do to stay healthy and alive is the exact opposite of whatever your government’s health agencies tell you to do!!!

Expand full comment

“In a meta-analysis of 63 studies of ivermectin versus COVID-19 in humans, 100% of these have shown positive results.” How about a link to the journal article or preprint of this analysis? You link lots of sub-studies, but not the old (pre-9 Sept 2021, when this article was written) 63-study meta-analysis.

Expand full comment

You're too generous, I don't call this ignorance. I'd call it malfeasance or corruption....

Expand full comment

" In this population comparison, risk of COVID-19 death was found to be 88.2% lower and mortality 85.7% lower in 31 countries ..."

I must be reading this wrong. Does the 85.7% figure constitute all cause mortality or is there a typo in that sentence?

Expand full comment