Reuters struck again last night, re-posting my tweet of a year ago, again twisting facts, in order to allege misinformation, thereby obscuring an alarming risk of mask-wearing.
The evidence is clear that masks don't work. The evidence is clear that masks are dangerous. Fauxi demands we wear them. The propaganda press enforces it. The only possible reasons are they're ignorant, or they're naively hopeful it will help a few without being too harmful to the many, or they're evil. Fauxi is clearly not ignorant. His media sycophants might be ignorant, but if so it's willful. Dr Huber's analysis shows Fauxi knew it was dangerous for the many, not just the few. So that leaves evil. I fully expect he and others will eventually be prosecuted. When the public learns the extent to which we have been misled, they will demand it. We need to keep telling them. This report could become Exhibit A in his indictment.
"no successful species has ever deliberately obstructed their own breathing, or rigged a moist warm bacteria incubator at the entrance to their airways"
Well, that would describe the mouth, plus the sinuses. I think the problem with masks is more the dryness and physical harshness. This gives more rugged microorganisms preferential residence. Fungi and biofilm-producing strains of bacteria benefit over more temperate strains. (That's also my uneasiness with this fad over rinses.)
Either way the end point is the same - the respiratory system doesn't want to be masked!
Masks also increase CO2 concentration, which diminishes mental and physical performance. That diminished capacity probably makes the ineffective fetish seem acceptable.
In a short time, the world went from a place of people too wise to place a plastic bag over the head to people unwise enough to adopt a more chronic breath obstruction as a daily punishment.
Excellent report. Thanks very much! I hope all your readers will tell others about it. The problem is it's too many words and way too many numbers for many Americans to endure or even to understand. I saw utube videos last year with similar conclusions and much more dramatic. Utube has, of course, banned them, which is the real problem we face. We need to find ways to bypass the censors to get the word out that the government is evil, the medical industry is mindlessly obeying because medical bureaucrats are evil, and journalists have become propagandists for evil, therefore they're also evil. The worst casualty has been undermining so many vital institutions.
The banned videos showed a mask smoke test, where the subject inhaled cigarette smoke with particles about the size of virus particles, and exhaling through a series of masks, including well fitted n95. All passed smoke through the fabric, but most of it bypassed the mask entirely, escaping around the edges. I had observed that already, having seem my glasses fog up while wearing the mask. The clear message was masks don't protect t by ecwearer or bystanders from virus transmission. The other video was an OSHA employee with a probably unapproved demo using OSHA industrial CO2 tester with a variety of masks showing the CO2 concentration exceeded OSHA standards in seconds. The clear message was masks are unhealthy and will make the wearers stupid. Which is probably the real objective.
Colleen, so you’re the one who unearthed that Fauci paper demonstrating that the 1918 flu epidemic deaths were primarily caused by bacterial pneumonia? Good detective work!
You might be interested in an extensively documented report on masks prepared by one of my Australian subscribers, a former principal researcher at Queensland Health, to accompany a petition. For her credentials and a link to that PDF as well as her two other exceptional reports on lockdowns and PCR tests, see the Petitions section of my Recommendations Roundup: Down Under Edition (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/recommendations-roundup-2-down-under-f04).
On the Flip Side of Mask Wearing: Increased Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds and a Risk-Reducing Solution | Environmental Science & Technology (acs.org)
U state your point clearly and directly, supported by research. They do NOT like that style. I've noticed a similar pattern in those being censored. Ur too good to directly engage 😎
The evidence is clear that masks don't work. The evidence is clear that masks are dangerous. Fauxi demands we wear them. The propaganda press enforces it. The only possible reasons are they're ignorant, or they're naively hopeful it will help a few without being too harmful to the many, or they're evil. Fauxi is clearly not ignorant. His media sycophants might be ignorant, but if so it's willful. Dr Huber's analysis shows Fauxi knew it was dangerous for the many, not just the few. So that leaves evil. I fully expect he and others will eventually be prosecuted. When the public learns the extent to which we have been misled, they will demand it. We need to keep telling them. This report could become Exhibit A in his indictment.
"no successful species has ever deliberately obstructed their own breathing, or rigged a moist warm bacteria incubator at the entrance to their airways"
Well, that would describe the mouth, plus the sinuses. I think the problem with masks is more the dryness and physical harshness. This gives more rugged microorganisms preferential residence. Fungi and biofilm-producing strains of bacteria benefit over more temperate strains. (That's also my uneasiness with this fad over rinses.)
Either way the end point is the same - the respiratory system doesn't want to be masked!
Masks also increase CO2 concentration, which diminishes mental and physical performance. That diminished capacity probably makes the ineffective fetish seem acceptable.
Our team had also studied those phenomena, the harms that have been observed to occur to various organs after hypoxia and hypercapnia caused by obstruction of breathing. https://pdmj.org/papers/masks_false_safety_and_real_dangers_part3/
In a short time, the world went from a place of people too wise to place a plastic bag over the head to people unwise enough to adopt a more chronic breath obstruction as a daily punishment.
Excellent report. Thanks very much! I hope all your readers will tell others about it. The problem is it's too many words and way too many numbers for many Americans to endure or even to understand. I saw utube videos last year with similar conclusions and much more dramatic. Utube has, of course, banned them, which is the real problem we face. We need to find ways to bypass the censors to get the word out that the government is evil, the medical industry is mindlessly obeying because medical bureaucrats are evil, and journalists have become propagandists for evil, therefore they're also evil. The worst casualty has been undermining so many vital institutions.
The banned videos showed a mask smoke test, where the subject inhaled cigarette smoke with particles about the size of virus particles, and exhaling through a series of masks, including well fitted n95. All passed smoke through the fabric, but most of it bypassed the mask entirely, escaping around the edges. I had observed that already, having seem my glasses fog up while wearing the mask. The clear message was masks don't protect t by ecwearer or bystanders from virus transmission. The other video was an OSHA employee with a probably unapproved demo using OSHA industrial CO2 tester with a variety of masks showing the CO2 concentration exceeded OSHA standards in seconds. The clear message was masks are unhealthy and will make the wearers stupid. Which is probably the real objective.
Tell your friends.
Colleen, so you’re the one who unearthed that Fauci paper demonstrating that the 1918 flu epidemic deaths were primarily caused by bacterial pneumonia? Good detective work!
Coincidentally, I recently asked Dr. Mike Yeadon if he was aware of that paper in this thread (https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/kitten-corner-thinking-about-covid/comments). Of course, he was and had even shared it recently on his Telegram channel called “Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon.”
You might be interested in an extensively documented report on masks prepared by one of my Australian subscribers, a former principal researcher at Queensland Health, to accompany a petition. For her credentials and a link to that PDF as well as her two other exceptional reports on lockdowns and PCR tests, see the Petitions section of my Recommendations Roundup: Down Under Edition (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/recommendations-roundup-2-down-under-f04).
On the Flip Side of Mask Wearing: Increased Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds and a Risk-Reducing Solution | Environmental Science & Technology (acs.org)
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c04591?utm_source=SendGrid_ealert&utm_medium=ealert&utm_campaign=TOC_esthag_v55_i20&ref=SendGrid_ealert_TOC_esthag_v55_i20_
Thank you for sending this, a rarely considered but ubiquitous hazard of mask-wearing that people would have intelligently avoided just two years ago.
U state your point clearly and directly, supported by research. They do NOT like that style. I've noticed a similar pattern in those being censored. Ur too good to directly engage 😎