I hope that language helps some people. I think I am fortunate where I work, but to hold these members of the health community in such high esteem for so long, saying they are heroes, only to dump them by the wayside later, is unconscionable. And to reject natural immunity possibly even more so.
We'll probably find a lot more people finding religion. But the supremes also declared medical exemption is valid. We have large and still growing files of evidence the vaccines are both unsafe and ineffective. Denying exemption on that basis is denying science. We need to focus on the science "denial" by vax advocates. They've been indoctrinated to abhor "denial."
The last 30 years of climate fraud and 2 years of Covid fraud by the same fraudulent modelling methods shows us that "Science" can't be trusted. If you put your trust in captured "Science" you are in big trouble.
Science can't be trusted by people who understand science. Science is inherently adversarial. Every theory and conclusion is challenged, tested, and analyzed by others to confirm or refute, leading to clarifications and resulting progress. Those who don't understand science have no choice but to accept whatever self-proclaimed scientists declare. Failure of the education system.
Most of the medical exemptions I've written have been accepted by my patients' employers. My patients have the right not to be poisoned, and that is the basis of the exemption. I've given abundant evidence, from government data and clinical studies, in the several articles that I've written on the topic of COVID vaccine toxicity, all either summarized or in full here on Substack. So far, our side has won every court case where I submitted medical exemption. (The majority of these by far never go to court, only divorce & custody battle scenarios usually.)
I have a friend that was high up in HR at the local hospital and was included in many meetings regarding their vax mandate. The management of the hospital was ADAMANT that ALL employees MUST be vaccinated (with much sneering contempt too), but they did eventually relent and allow religious exemptions. She went to her primary care Dr. because she has had many adverse reactions to various vaccines and wanted a medical exemption. (She is not religious and would not claim that exemption) Her Dr. said that she "could not in good conscious", give her a medical exemption. She quit her job the next week and is currently unemployed.
The word "religious" brings stereotypes to mind. She may (or may not) find, if she re-examines the objections to vaccination at the end of my article, that she may find herself in sincere agreement with at least one of them, while leaving aside the holy roller stereotype.
Well, I know people who pretended to be despite being more atheist... What if her Religion is that religions are bs but the idea of protection of beliefs is Paramount
You can even plainly believe in mother nature as a religion and are against injecting foreign substances or drugs into the body
Exactly. My objection would be that I am created and am part of the creation in a symbiotic relationship. My immune system was made to protect me from all manner of diseases, and the creation itself provides the perfect remedies to keep it in a state of wellness. A man made therapeutic may be necessary in times of severe illness, but I am not in that state. The drug being mandated is for well people, and could disturb any system of my body, which I need for the rest of my time here on earth. My sincere belief is that I cannot in good conscience allow this to happen to me.
Thank you for focusing on this important topic. My daughter is an RN (surgical circulator) in a Glendale, AZ hospital. Although we were very much relieved that her religious exemption (four pages long, lots of essay questions on her beliefs, etc.) was ‘approved’ a few months ago, this still isn’t enough. Now she has to submit to (inaccurate) PCR tests weekly. And the discrimination and additional stress at work that she has endured...ugh! And she often hears of others at various hospitals who have had their religious exemptions ‘denied’. As you illustrate so well, none of this is legal by any stretch of the imagination. I pray for the day when they stop this horrible stuff.
General Flynn: BREAKING.. The UK government admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-vaccinated. The UK government has admitted that once you have been double-vaccinated, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity to Cover variants - or possibly any other virus. So let’s watch the “real” pandemic begin now! In its Week 42 “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report”, the UK Department of Health admits on page 23 that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination”. It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially permanent. What does this mean? We know that vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaccinated adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated ones). The British now find that the vaccine interferes with the body’s ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus. In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. In the long term, the vaccinated are far more susceptible to any mutations in the spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more. The unvaccinated, on the other hand, will gain lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once.
The first insurance companies are backing down because a huge wave of claims is coming their way. Anthony Fauci confirms that the PCR test cannot detect live viruses. Anthony Fauci confirms that neither the antigen test nor the PCR test can tell us whether someone is contagious or not!! This invalidates all the foundations of the so-called pandemic. The PCR test was the only indication of a pandemic. Without PCR-TETS no pandemic. For all the press workers, doctors, lawyers, prosecutors, etc. THIS is the final key, the ultimate proof that the measures must be lifted immediately!
Thank you for this article! What can you suggest for a federal employee who is seeking to have her religious exemption apply to the requirement for medical testing too? I’m being pressured to take a nasal swab every week while my “vaxxed” coworkers are not.
Not being an attorney, I really shouldn't opine on the (what I see as) outrageous HIPAA violation. As well as violation of the 14th Amendment regarding equal protections under the law, and especially Title VII, the 1964 Civil Rights Act which (I believe) specifically prohibits such discriminatory abuse by an employer.
However, that said, if you for some reason choose to "test" anyway, I have shown in earlier writing that the PCR "test" is utterly useless to test for infection, and can link to that if you like.
Also, toxic substances used on the nasal swabs are outrageous, and if you feel you must test with these, then spitting on the swab, rather than placing it on membranes would be much safer for you.
It’s blatantly discriminatory & coercive, with no basis in public health at all. The resources you provided may bolster my claim. I hope I don’t need an attorney…
Thank you for all your good work Dr. Huber. Heres another anecdote for you. Two of my family members are nurses who work for the state of California, we are Catholic & they both invoked their religious exemption for the covid vax & were both approved immediately. Its important for people to understand that for example, despite the pope's unfortunate endorsement of this poison garbage , a religious exemption is not something that any priest, bishop or pope "grants you." An exemption is something you invoke yourself, & the EEOC states that one does not even have to belong to an organized religion to invoke one. What clergy CAN do, although not required, is to write a letter of support, which merely serves as "corroborating evidence."
My relatives say that half (50%) of their coworkers aren't vaxxed, and management are mostly anti mandate, and this is the real truth, from commie-fornia.
See:
Bishop Athanasius Schneider Grants Religious Exemption Certificate for Those That Do Not Want to Receive Abortion-Tainted Vaccines
In principle, I think your last word alone should definitely be enough to reinforce basic human rights anywhere and always. To argue religious exemption though, your whole sentence seems undeniable.
I'm not a lawyer and not a US citizen but don't you think that they are going with a strictly literal interperetation of your 10th amendment? As in, as long as you are not held down and injected by someone but is instead given the choice "accept or be fired", there's been no violation.
Other than in spirit of course.
I'm curious how religious exemption works: how do you judge a religion to be "real" and how do you judge if someone is a believer or not? I mean, if someone is a jew or a moslem and demands exemption from spikeprotein injection because of that, and then is found drinking a glass of wine or eating pork rinds, does that invalidate their claim? And what happens if you switch religion or sect?
It all sounds like a total snake pit, rules wise. Wouldn't it be mch easier to let people simply opt out if they want to?
Yes, who is qualified to determine whether another's religious belief is sincere? So, yes, I think a simple declaration of bodily autonomy - the most basic human right - should always and everywhere be honored, which would obviate both medical and religious exemption. Regarding the 10th Amendment point, "accept or be fired" is not specifically given to the federal government by the Constitution, and so by the 10th Amendment is not within the power of the federal government, from my understanding. But also not being a lawyer, I am not best qualified to comment on that.
Thank you for replying. I took US basic civics at university as part of my english studies but that was when Clinton was in office the first time, so I'm "a bit" rusty on such matters.
Be thankful you have a constitution and a bill of rights, and at least in principle division of powers: we have neither. Our entire governemental structure is top-down, and there is no legal way at all to bring politicians or politicially appointed civil servants (generally admin staff and execs) to trial if they refuse to cooperate. It must be a criminal matter for that to happen, and even then it's a case for a special branch of the prosecutor's office.
Couple of years back the then head of the entire registry of vehicles, including those of the armed forces and the secret service and the police and military intelligence sent the entire database, uncrypted, to a serbian company. She had outsourced tech support to this company without clearing it with military intelligence (as Serbia is a russian lapdog) in clear criminal violation of procedure.
No charges were brought. No investigation. No nothing. She was ushered out "exit stage left" and spent three years in the time out box so to speak. Now she's back as the head of the internal psychological defense agency (read: internal psy-ops secret police).
Becuase she is a party lifer. Entered the youth brigade as a teen. Always been loyal to paty above all. Follows orders of superiors without question at never rats out superiors. A true politruk. A socialist democrat through and through.
It's sometimes amazing living in what is largely still a socialist country to read what you americans considerers slippery slope and dangerous totalitarian moves - a lot of that registres for us as "Isn't that just normal, that the police can tap your phone whenever they want?" I now european pundits often give americans a hard time, but to most of us the US is an inspiration, especially with regards to civil rights and free speech.
I believe you are right about the 10th Amendment. Whatever powers are not enumerated in the Constitution to the Executive or Legislature…are reserved to the States, or the people.
It really does matter what State you’re in, because it will revert to your governor. Even without this CMS mandate, we live under the Governor’s mandate. My son is in healthcare, and I want him to move to a free state to avoid the Ethylene Oxide up his nasal orifice weekly!
mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing
The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight
Thank you for those resources. Also, I neglected to mention that the current COVID vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cell line HEK 293, in case anyone wants to look up more specific information, and that baby HEK, her initials, was the 293rd in that particular series of gruesome experiments on aborted fetuses. That is, the previous 292 did not take for some reason, for their purposes.
I hope that language helps some people. I think I am fortunate where I work, but to hold these members of the health community in such high esteem for so long, saying they are heroes, only to dump them by the wayside later, is unconscionable. And to reject natural immunity possibly even more so.
We'll probably find a lot more people finding religion. But the supremes also declared medical exemption is valid. We have large and still growing files of evidence the vaccines are both unsafe and ineffective. Denying exemption on that basis is denying science. We need to focus on the science "denial" by vax advocates. They've been indoctrinated to abhor "denial."
The last 30 years of climate fraud and 2 years of Covid fraud by the same fraudulent modelling methods shows us that "Science" can't be trusted. If you put your trust in captured "Science" you are in big trouble.
Science can't be trusted by people who understand science. Science is inherently adversarial. Every theory and conclusion is challenged, tested, and analyzed by others to confirm or refute, leading to clarifications and resulting progress. Those who don't understand science have no choice but to accept whatever self-proclaimed scientists declare. Failure of the education system.
Exactly the very concept of"settled science" is a misnomer.
Almost all hospitals and employers have ‘fixed’ it so that no medical exemptions will be approved. It’s inexcusable.
Medical exemptions are impossible because the psychopathic CDC said it's only proven by 2 reactions to these GENOCIDAL clot shots
Most of the medical exemptions I've written have been accepted by my patients' employers. My patients have the right not to be poisoned, and that is the basis of the exemption. I've given abundant evidence, from government data and clinical studies, in the several articles that I've written on the topic of COVID vaccine toxicity, all either summarized or in full here on Substack. So far, our side has won every court case where I submitted medical exemption. (The majority of these by far never go to court, only divorce & custody battle scenarios usually.)
I have a friend that was high up in HR at the local hospital and was included in many meetings regarding their vax mandate. The management of the hospital was ADAMANT that ALL employees MUST be vaccinated (with much sneering contempt too), but they did eventually relent and allow religious exemptions. She went to her primary care Dr. because she has had many adverse reactions to various vaccines and wanted a medical exemption. (She is not religious and would not claim that exemption) Her Dr. said that she "could not in good conscious", give her a medical exemption. She quit her job the next week and is currently unemployed.
The word "religious" brings stereotypes to mind. She may (or may not) find, if she re-examines the objections to vaccination at the end of my article, that she may find herself in sincere agreement with at least one of them, while leaving aside the holy roller stereotype.
Well, I know people who pretended to be despite being more atheist... What if her Religion is that religions are bs but the idea of protection of beliefs is Paramount
You can even plainly believe in mother nature as a religion and are against injecting foreign substances or drugs into the body
Exactly. My objection would be that I am created and am part of the creation in a symbiotic relationship. My immune system was made to protect me from all manner of diseases, and the creation itself provides the perfect remedies to keep it in a state of wellness. A man made therapeutic may be necessary in times of severe illness, but I am not in that state. The drug being mandated is for well people, and could disturb any system of my body, which I need for the rest of my time here on earth. My sincere belief is that I cannot in good conscience allow this to happen to me.
Something like that BECAUSE it’s true!
Untold number of stories like this...
Thank you for providing this information and these examples in such a timely fashion. God bless you.
Thank you for focusing on this important topic. My daughter is an RN (surgical circulator) in a Glendale, AZ hospital. Although we were very much relieved that her religious exemption (four pages long, lots of essay questions on her beliefs, etc.) was ‘approved’ a few months ago, this still isn’t enough. Now she has to submit to (inaccurate) PCR tests weekly. And the discrimination and additional stress at work that she has endured...ugh! And she often hears of others at various hospitals who have had their religious exemptions ‘denied’. As you illustrate so well, none of this is legal by any stretch of the imagination. I pray for the day when they stop this horrible stuff.
Hi! I am a surgical RN in AZ, as well. Same situation. We need to stick together🙏💖
General Flynn: BREAKING.. The UK government admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-vaccinated. The UK government has admitted that once you have been double-vaccinated, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity to Cover variants - or possibly any other virus. So let’s watch the “real” pandemic begin now! In its Week 42 “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report”, the UK Department of Health admits on page 23 that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination”. It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially permanent. What does this mean? We know that vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaccinated adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated ones). The British now find that the vaccine interferes with the body’s ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus. In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. In the long term, the vaccinated are far more susceptible to any mutations in the spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more. The unvaccinated, on the other hand, will gain lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once.
The first insurance companies are backing down because a huge wave of claims is coming their way. Anthony Fauci confirms that the PCR test cannot detect live viruses. Anthony Fauci confirms that neither the antigen test nor the PCR test can tell us whether someone is contagious or not!! This invalidates all the foundations of the so-called pandemic. The PCR test was the only indication of a pandemic. Without PCR-TETS no pandemic. For all the press workers, doctors, lawyers, prosecutors, etc. THIS is the final key, the ultimate proof that the measures must be lifted immediately!
Fantastic commentary! Many thanks!
I have asked from the moment governors started banning hcl & then ivermectin, "how is this not practicing medicine without a license?"
Same with forced injections of toxic failure of a pseudo-vaccine.
I like that "vaccine superstition cult"... They are actually the ones that believe in false idols.
Thank you for this article! What can you suggest for a federal employee who is seeking to have her religious exemption apply to the requirement for medical testing too? I’m being pressured to take a nasal swab every week while my “vaxxed” coworkers are not.
Not being an attorney, I really shouldn't opine on the (what I see as) outrageous HIPAA violation. As well as violation of the 14th Amendment regarding equal protections under the law, and especially Title VII, the 1964 Civil Rights Act which (I believe) specifically prohibits such discriminatory abuse by an employer.
However, that said, if you for some reason choose to "test" anyway, I have shown in earlier writing that the PCR "test" is utterly useless to test for infection, and can link to that if you like.
Also, toxic substances used on the nasal swabs are outrageous, and if you feel you must test with these, then spitting on the swab, rather than placing it on membranes would be much safer for you.
It’s blatantly discriminatory & coercive, with no basis in public health at all. The resources you provided may bolster my claim. I hope I don’t need an attorney…
Thank you for all your good work Dr. Huber. Heres another anecdote for you. Two of my family members are nurses who work for the state of California, we are Catholic & they both invoked their religious exemption for the covid vax & were both approved immediately. Its important for people to understand that for example, despite the pope's unfortunate endorsement of this poison garbage , a religious exemption is not something that any priest, bishop or pope "grants you." An exemption is something you invoke yourself, & the EEOC states that one does not even have to belong to an organized religion to invoke one. What clergy CAN do, although not required, is to write a letter of support, which merely serves as "corroborating evidence."
My relatives say that half (50%) of their coworkers aren't vaxxed, and management are mostly anti mandate, and this is the real truth, from commie-fornia.
See:
Bishop Athanasius Schneider Grants Religious Exemption Certificate for Those That Do Not Want to Receive Abortion-Tainted Vaccines
https://www.livefatima.io/exemption/
God gave us freedom not any constitution or person and the only "religious exemption" anyone therefore needs is to say No!
In principle, I think your last word alone should definitely be enough to reinforce basic human rights anywhere and always. To argue religious exemption though, your whole sentence seems undeniable.
Interested foreigner speculating:
I'm not a lawyer and not a US citizen but don't you think that they are going with a strictly literal interperetation of your 10th amendment? As in, as long as you are not held down and injected by someone but is instead given the choice "accept or be fired", there's been no violation.
Other than in spirit of course.
I'm curious how religious exemption works: how do you judge a religion to be "real" and how do you judge if someone is a believer or not? I mean, if someone is a jew or a moslem and demands exemption from spikeprotein injection because of that, and then is found drinking a glass of wine or eating pork rinds, does that invalidate their claim? And what happens if you switch religion or sect?
It all sounds like a total snake pit, rules wise. Wouldn't it be mch easier to let people simply opt out if they want to?
Yes, who is qualified to determine whether another's religious belief is sincere? So, yes, I think a simple declaration of bodily autonomy - the most basic human right - should always and everywhere be honored, which would obviate both medical and religious exemption. Regarding the 10th Amendment point, "accept or be fired" is not specifically given to the federal government by the Constitution, and so by the 10th Amendment is not within the power of the federal government, from my understanding. But also not being a lawyer, I am not best qualified to comment on that.
Thank you for replying. I took US basic civics at university as part of my english studies but that was when Clinton was in office the first time, so I'm "a bit" rusty on such matters.
Be thankful you have a constitution and a bill of rights, and at least in principle division of powers: we have neither. Our entire governemental structure is top-down, and there is no legal way at all to bring politicians or politicially appointed civil servants (generally admin staff and execs) to trial if they refuse to cooperate. It must be a criminal matter for that to happen, and even then it's a case for a special branch of the prosecutor's office.
Couple of years back the then head of the entire registry of vehicles, including those of the armed forces and the secret service and the police and military intelligence sent the entire database, uncrypted, to a serbian company. She had outsourced tech support to this company without clearing it with military intelligence (as Serbia is a russian lapdog) in clear criminal violation of procedure.
No charges were brought. No investigation. No nothing. She was ushered out "exit stage left" and spent three years in the time out box so to speak. Now she's back as the head of the internal psychological defense agency (read: internal psy-ops secret police).
Becuase she is a party lifer. Entered the youth brigade as a teen. Always been loyal to paty above all. Follows orders of superiors without question at never rats out superiors. A true politruk. A socialist democrat through and through.
It's sometimes amazing living in what is largely still a socialist country to read what you americans considerers slippery slope and dangerous totalitarian moves - a lot of that registres for us as "Isn't that just normal, that the police can tap your phone whenever they want?" I now european pundits often give americans a hard time, but to most of us the US is an inspiration, especially with regards to civil rights and free speech.
I believe you are right about the 10th Amendment. Whatever powers are not enumerated in the Constitution to the Executive or Legislature…are reserved to the States, or the people.
It really does matter what State you’re in, because it will revert to your governor. Even without this CMS mandate, we live under the Governor’s mandate. My son is in healthcare, and I want him to move to a free state to avoid the Ethylene Oxide up his nasal orifice weekly!
Alas, they don't allow religious exemption here in Australia.
mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing
The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-are-gene-therapy-may
Thank you for those resources. Also, I neglected to mention that the current COVID vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cell line HEK 293, in case anyone wants to look up more specific information, and that baby HEK, her initials, was the 293rd in that particular series of gruesome experiments on aborted fetuses. That is, the previous 292 did not take for some reason, for their purposes.