Mar 13, 2023·edited Mar 13, 2023Liked by Dr. Colleen Huber
This is a great article! Thank you. Makes so much sense. Something always told me to steer clear of the flu vaccines. More recently there's been evidence that the more flu vaccines you get, the more likely it is you'll get the flu. Anecdotally, the only people I know who get a flu shot regularly also get sick every winter, sometimes more than once. Over the last 3 years, I've become more skeptical of ALL vaccines. Seems like the principle "you can't get something for nothing" applies to vaccines as well. Maybe a vaccine will cause your immune system to become more likely to fight off a specific pathogen, but at what cost? What damage are you doing to your immune system and your overall health by taking that vaccine? Answer: A lot more than we've been led to believe.
Superb! As a Cardiothoracic surgeon, with experience treating "Shock lung" - "cytokine storm" - whatever the name of the day is popular.. This explains it nicely - Superbly well written and graphics show detail. I feel I should repost on my substack and add some of my experience into the flow of information. basically this --Exactly.. but the spike protein, circulating through capillaries in the alveolar sac wall, is so very very close that when it triggers an inflammatory white cell to explode into an aggressive killer cell (see below).. then the damage extends into the alveolar cell wall, destroys its function if not destroying the sac itself, and that sac is now out of commission for O2 exchange.. Do this with enough (thousands) of air sacs and you see “Shock lung..” Or “Cytokine storm lung. “ Dump in Remdesivir (poison) and put patient on HPV - with the pneumatic barotrauma following and you have 80% mortality of those ICU patients. Hospital collects and extra 29,000 or more in Medicare dollars if a positive COVID test can be somewhere on the chart.. Frees up the ICU bed for another victim, another cytokine storm, and another Medicare check for the administrators bottom line.
Example… WBCs are charged with the mission to clean up problem proteins/cells/viruses/etc etc. There fore.. when a patient has RBCs leaking out into the extravascular and extra cellular space the trash piles up. Let’s say I have chronic venous hypertension from genetically inferior collagen tissue in my lower extremity venous valves.. I develop varicose vein.. then ambulatory upright posture makes the hydrostatic pressure even higher as the “check valves” down the leg are incompetent.. and the veins dilate up making the incompetence worse, the pressures higher. Eventually (women) complain about the unsightliness of the serpiginous varicose veins.. with time there is chronic diapedesis of RBCs out of the venous capillaries at the ankle and the trash builds up. Eventually the WBCs go do their work to eat up the fragments of RBCs and that iron is returned to the circulation where new RBCs are made (spleen, bone marrow etc)..
However, in the clean up, WBCs leave behind proteases that attack other proteins in the area of the ankle and eventually a red area replaces the “rust colored” medial malleolar area.. untreated, the inflammation continues and eventually a “venous ulcer” is evident and it can spread. We spend BILLIONS of health care dollars on these venous ulcers. Usually not deadly and not risk for limb loss.. just a pain in the butt to care for and they look like hell. Imagine that mess in your lungs… thank you spike protein.
Mar 13, 2023·edited Mar 13, 2023Liked by Dr. Colleen Huber
This is in-line with the Polio vaccine argument; whether to use an injectable vaccine, or an oral vaccine. Polio entered the body through the digestive tract, so it made more sense to use an oral vaccine rather than an injectable.
However the idea that polio has been irradicated is a lie.
*** Sabin’s live-virus, oral polio vaccine (administered in drops or on a sugar cube) soon replaced Salk’s killed-virus, injectable vaccine in many parts of the world. * In 1994 the WHO declared that naturally occurring poliovirus had been eradicated *from the Western Hemisphere* owing to repeated mass immunization campaigns with the Sabin vaccine in Central and South America. The only occurrences of paralytic poliomyelitis *in the West* after this time were the few cases caused by the live-virus vaccine itself. ***
Notice they keep saying, "in the west" because people still get polio in other parts of the world.
The important thing to note about the COVID-19 response, is that EVERYONE (real virologists) already knew that the vaccines would be ineffective. The next logical question is, "Why push them on everyone when they don't/wouldn't work?"
As soon as SARS-CoV-2 was named, all historically accurate virology data, "The Science" was thrown out entirely, it was replaced by the New Science. Never mind that people were exposed and already recovered, "The New Science" claimed that you could catch SARS-CoV-2 again -- just weeks later.
Since when has that been the consensus in virology -- ever? Chickenpox was never a worry, you catch it when you're a kid and that's it, you're immunized. But not SARS-Cov-2, you can just keep getting it every week? None of that made any sense.
I wrote this a few weeks back:
The Chinese listed zero COVID deaths for more than a year. Which is probably true. It's most likely that China is looking at COVID deaths like an insurance company. If you die "with" COVID you didn't die "from" COVID. Say someone died with COVID but dies because of pneumonia, then they didn't die of COVID they died of pneumonia.
Here, in the US, the CDC lists fatalities for the Flu, as "Flu related illnesses." But that's inaccurate as well, because other colds could cause pneumonia (which is usually how Flu deaths occur).
But we do KNOW with 100% certainty that the CDC numbers are total BS, because they literally listed anyone who died with COVID (tested positive within 28 days of death) as a "COVID death." Anyone trying to accurately gauge the situation wouldn't do that. The data would be useless.
The wholesale horrific response could not have been a mistake, here's why.
1.) The entire therapeutic route was abandoned before there was time to determine if any treatments were working or not. DARPA had data on Ivermectin's effectiveness against multiple types of viral infections, but that was ignored. The data was there the whole time, but you had to know exactly where to look for it. It's on the NIH website.
2.) From my own and other people's anecdotal evidence, the symptoms for COVID didn't make sense. Nearly everyone who tested positive for COVID complained of widely different different symptoms. While different symptoms are possible, they are not probable. Take the Flu for instance. The common symptoms of the Flu are the only reason anyone knows to get tested -- for the Flu. Same with most illnesses. Only COVID had such a wide array of symptoms, often times completely different for people within a household.
3.) The World Heath Organization redefined "herd immunity" to ONLY include people who were vaccinated, not people who had prior infection and recovered. They then changed the definition back later on, when people caught on. The WHO released guidelines on how to operate the PCR tests that were far outside the guidelines, which would lead to false positives. Then immediately after the vaccine* rollout, they revised those numbers back to where they originally were. So the infection rates would appear lower. There's no scientific reason to demand that tests be operated in a manor that will result in false positives, then changed once you release a vaccine. That would muddy your own data.
4.) The dangerous mRNA vaccines* were the ONLY "acceptable" solution to treat COVID. Vaccines in general are usually years down the road, before release. Why would you push the vaccine route first, and not pursue the therapeutic rout first, or at least at the same time? Similarly, COVID was shown [CDC data] to be on par with the Flu for survivability. Why would they mandate vaccinations for something that's no more dangerous than the Flu, by their own estimation?
5.) When the mRNA vaccines* were showing bad outcomes, whether it be terrible side effects, general efficacy, or failure to stop the spread, they were sill pushed -- even harder. Meaning that mass vaccination* was the true goal, NOT stopping some illness that was ravaging the planet. They wanted to get as many people as possible to take the mRNA vaccines* regardless of possible injury, ineffectiveness, or inability to stop the spread.
6.) There was a massive government directed plan to suppress/censor any information related to the vaccines*. Information that has been proven factual -- because it came from Pfizer's own trial data was considered "disinformation?" Information was blocked on multiple video streaming services, and multiple social media services. The Twitter Files prove this. Why block the manufacturers trial data? Informed consent...?
7.) The G20 countries agreed to a "health/vaccine passport system" to limit the movement of people world-wide. Why would they do that when it's become clear that the vaccines* didn't achieve their goals? Now that they are considering COVID as a seasonal illness, there's no need for a passport system. Passports make no sense for a seasonal illness -- unless it was part of a plan all along.
If one were to run a PSYOP to try and trick the world to go along with losing their freedoms, how much different would it be?
Why stay clear of only vaccines intended to ameliorate respiratory illness? How about ALL vaccines? They are all loaded with toxic ingredients and they interfere with the body's natural immunity..
A good part of the problem is believing in the "One Trick Pony" of viral infection. Even if you believe in such a simplistic theory of causation of illness, the fact is that such a theory has never been vetted in the real world.
Initial conclusions regarding Covid never involved examining large groups of 'infected' people utilizing electron microscopy (with proper controls) but instead were deemed as "fact" on the basis of PCR computer simulations.
Songs against vaccination and medical fraud.
JUST TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. “Straight shooter” advice on vaccination for the brainwashed
Love this. It’s actual science. Brilliantly and clearly explained that you would love a, Covid not a vaccine, believer to read it, as you can only fail to understand how you have explained chasing the prevention of respiratory viral infection through raising blood IgG levels, if you are ideologically captured.
Thank you for this, Dr. Huber. Referring to your last sentence, I actually consider these injections to be *worse than* useless, due to their adverse side effects.
Brilliant! Are you aware of microbiologist Jonathan Jay Couey's investigation into the pandemic? Having been a member of the group "Drastic" that was called into life in pursuit of the truth believing it had to be a lab leak, he has come to the conclusion that it never was a pathogenic coronavirus, only a purified, Infectious cDNA clone. Lab leak yes, but not the kind they now want to make us believe. They said it was a conspiracy theory, but now they WANT us to believe in it. Because it serves their narrative that calls for repeated lockdowns, masking and vaccine ID. In this presentation, he lays it all out:
What about measles? Measles is a virus with respiratory transmission, and I understood its vaccine was very effective? Single dose, good for a lifetime?
I do like and enjoy your posts Dr. Huber! I am curious about this subject. Near the end, you wrote, "...all respiratory viruses, arrives to the upper airways first, and then to the lungs in natural infection. This is where antibodies might be useful, at the mucous membranes of the respiratory tract, where plasma cells produce secretory IgA antibodies, and at the alveolar epithelium". Again, I'm just curious, where are the "mucous membranes of the respiratory tract" located? Is this in the nose, the throat, mouth? Seems like a vaccine spray would be more useful. Anyways, keep up the good work. As always, educating me one tiny bit at a time.
This is a great article! Thank you. Makes so much sense. Something always told me to steer clear of the flu vaccines. More recently there's been evidence that the more flu vaccines you get, the more likely it is you'll get the flu. Anecdotally, the only people I know who get a flu shot regularly also get sick every winter, sometimes more than once. Over the last 3 years, I've become more skeptical of ALL vaccines. Seems like the principle "you can't get something for nothing" applies to vaccines as well. Maybe a vaccine will cause your immune system to become more likely to fight off a specific pathogen, but at what cost? What damage are you doing to your immune system and your overall health by taking that vaccine? Answer: A lot more than we've been led to believe.
Superb! As a Cardiothoracic surgeon, with experience treating "Shock lung" - "cytokine storm" - whatever the name of the day is popular.. This explains it nicely - Superbly well written and graphics show detail. I feel I should repost on my substack and add some of my experience into the flow of information. basically this --Exactly.. but the spike protein, circulating through capillaries in the alveolar sac wall, is so very very close that when it triggers an inflammatory white cell to explode into an aggressive killer cell (see below).. then the damage extends into the alveolar cell wall, destroys its function if not destroying the sac itself, and that sac is now out of commission for O2 exchange.. Do this with enough (thousands) of air sacs and you see “Shock lung..” Or “Cytokine storm lung. “ Dump in Remdesivir (poison) and put patient on HPV - with the pneumatic barotrauma following and you have 80% mortality of those ICU patients. Hospital collects and extra 29,000 or more in Medicare dollars if a positive COVID test can be somewhere on the chart.. Frees up the ICU bed for another victim, another cytokine storm, and another Medicare check for the administrators bottom line.
Example… WBCs are charged with the mission to clean up problem proteins/cells/viruses/etc etc. There fore.. when a patient has RBCs leaking out into the extravascular and extra cellular space the trash piles up. Let’s say I have chronic venous hypertension from genetically inferior collagen tissue in my lower extremity venous valves.. I develop varicose vein.. then ambulatory upright posture makes the hydrostatic pressure even higher as the “check valves” down the leg are incompetent.. and the veins dilate up making the incompetence worse, the pressures higher. Eventually (women) complain about the unsightliness of the serpiginous varicose veins.. with time there is chronic diapedesis of RBCs out of the venous capillaries at the ankle and the trash builds up. Eventually the WBCs go do their work to eat up the fragments of RBCs and that iron is returned to the circulation where new RBCs are made (spleen, bone marrow etc)..
However, in the clean up, WBCs leave behind proteases that attack other proteins in the area of the ankle and eventually a red area replaces the “rust colored” medial malleolar area.. untreated, the inflammation continues and eventually a “venous ulcer” is evident and it can spread. We spend BILLIONS of health care dollars on these venous ulcers. Usually not deadly and not risk for limb loss.. just a pain in the butt to care for and they look like hell. Imagine that mess in your lungs… thank you spike protein.
This is in-line with the Polio vaccine argument; whether to use an injectable vaccine, or an oral vaccine. Polio entered the body through the digestive tract, so it made more sense to use an oral vaccine rather than an injectable.
However the idea that polio has been irradicated is a lie.
https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/jonas-salk-and-albert-bruce-sabin
*** Sabin’s live-virus, oral polio vaccine (administered in drops or on a sugar cube) soon replaced Salk’s killed-virus, injectable vaccine in many parts of the world. * In 1994 the WHO declared that naturally occurring poliovirus had been eradicated *from the Western Hemisphere* owing to repeated mass immunization campaigns with the Sabin vaccine in Central and South America. The only occurrences of paralytic poliomyelitis *in the West* after this time were the few cases caused by the live-virus vaccine itself. ***
Notice they keep saying, "in the west" because people still get polio in other parts of the world.
The important thing to note about the COVID-19 response, is that EVERYONE (real virologists) already knew that the vaccines would be ineffective. The next logical question is, "Why push them on everyone when they don't/wouldn't work?"
As soon as SARS-CoV-2 was named, all historically accurate virology data, "The Science" was thrown out entirely, it was replaced by the New Science. Never mind that people were exposed and already recovered, "The New Science" claimed that you could catch SARS-CoV-2 again -- just weeks later.
Since when has that been the consensus in virology -- ever? Chickenpox was never a worry, you catch it when you're a kid and that's it, you're immunized. But not SARS-Cov-2, you can just keep getting it every week? None of that made any sense.
I wrote this a few weeks back:
The Chinese listed zero COVID deaths for more than a year. Which is probably true. It's most likely that China is looking at COVID deaths like an insurance company. If you die "with" COVID you didn't die "from" COVID. Say someone died with COVID but dies because of pneumonia, then they didn't die of COVID they died of pneumonia.
Here, in the US, the CDC lists fatalities for the Flu, as "Flu related illnesses." But that's inaccurate as well, because other colds could cause pneumonia (which is usually how Flu deaths occur).
But we do KNOW with 100% certainty that the CDC numbers are total BS, because they literally listed anyone who died with COVID (tested positive within 28 days of death) as a "COVID death." Anyone trying to accurately gauge the situation wouldn't do that. The data would be useless.
The wholesale horrific response could not have been a mistake, here's why.
1.) The entire therapeutic route was abandoned before there was time to determine if any treatments were working or not. DARPA had data on Ivermectin's effectiveness against multiple types of viral infections, but that was ignored. The data was there the whole time, but you had to know exactly where to look for it. It's on the NIH website.
2.) From my own and other people's anecdotal evidence, the symptoms for COVID didn't make sense. Nearly everyone who tested positive for COVID complained of widely different different symptoms. While different symptoms are possible, they are not probable. Take the Flu for instance. The common symptoms of the Flu are the only reason anyone knows to get tested -- for the Flu. Same with most illnesses. Only COVID had such a wide array of symptoms, often times completely different for people within a household.
3.) The World Heath Organization redefined "herd immunity" to ONLY include people who were vaccinated, not people who had prior infection and recovered. They then changed the definition back later on, when people caught on. The WHO released guidelines on how to operate the PCR tests that were far outside the guidelines, which would lead to false positives. Then immediately after the vaccine* rollout, they revised those numbers back to where they originally were. So the infection rates would appear lower. There's no scientific reason to demand that tests be operated in a manor that will result in false positives, then changed once you release a vaccine. That would muddy your own data.
4.) The dangerous mRNA vaccines* were the ONLY "acceptable" solution to treat COVID. Vaccines in general are usually years down the road, before release. Why would you push the vaccine route first, and not pursue the therapeutic rout first, or at least at the same time? Similarly, COVID was shown [CDC data] to be on par with the Flu for survivability. Why would they mandate vaccinations for something that's no more dangerous than the Flu, by their own estimation?
5.) When the mRNA vaccines* were showing bad outcomes, whether it be terrible side effects, general efficacy, or failure to stop the spread, they were sill pushed -- even harder. Meaning that mass vaccination* was the true goal, NOT stopping some illness that was ravaging the planet. They wanted to get as many people as possible to take the mRNA vaccines* regardless of possible injury, ineffectiveness, or inability to stop the spread.
6.) There was a massive government directed plan to suppress/censor any information related to the vaccines*. Information that has been proven factual -- because it came from Pfizer's own trial data was considered "disinformation?" Information was blocked on multiple video streaming services, and multiple social media services. The Twitter Files prove this. Why block the manufacturers trial data? Informed consent...?
7.) The G20 countries agreed to a "health/vaccine passport system" to limit the movement of people world-wide. Why would they do that when it's become clear that the vaccines* didn't achieve their goals? Now that they are considering COVID as a seasonal illness, there's no need for a passport system. Passports make no sense for a seasonal illness -- unless it was part of a plan all along.
If one were to run a PSYOP to try and trick the world to go along with losing their freedoms, how much different would it be?
Why stay clear of only vaccines intended to ameliorate respiratory illness? How about ALL vaccines? They are all loaded with toxic ingredients and they interfere with the body's natural immunity..
A good part of the problem is believing in the "One Trick Pony" of viral infection. Even if you believe in such a simplistic theory of causation of illness, the fact is that such a theory has never been vetted in the real world.
Initial conclusions regarding Covid never involved examining large groups of 'infected' people utilizing electron microscopy (with proper controls) but instead were deemed as "fact" on the basis of PCR computer simulations.
Songs against vaccination and medical fraud.
JUST TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. “Straight shooter” advice on vaccination for the brainwashed
https://turfseer.substack.com/p/just-too-good-to-be-true
A man takes the virus as his bride. Watch Turfseer’s ONE TRICK PONY. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/one-trick-pony.
THE MYOCARDITIS BLUES. A man sings the blues after coming down with side effects from the mRNA vaccine followed by a deadly heart inflammation. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-myocarditis-blues
A song about the fraud of Virology. Listen to THE DISH. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-dish. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-dish
Subscribe to Turfseer's Newsletter. Songs, music videos and much more.
Love this. It’s actual science. Brilliantly and clearly explained that you would love a, Covid not a vaccine, believer to read it, as you can only fail to understand how you have explained chasing the prevention of respiratory viral infection through raising blood IgG levels, if you are ideologically captured.
Thank you for this, Dr. Huber. Referring to your last sentence, I actually consider these injections to be *worse than* useless, due to their adverse side effects.
Thank you for this explanation. And for summarizing it at the end.
Given these facts, it’s ridiculous that any credible medical professional would support an injection for respiratory illnesses.
Your work is deeply appreciated.
Great article! This is by far the most convincing and clearest explanation of the futility of lung disease vaccines.
Brilliant! Are you aware of microbiologist Jonathan Jay Couey's investigation into the pandemic? Having been a member of the group "Drastic" that was called into life in pursuit of the truth believing it had to be a lab leak, he has come to the conclusion that it never was a pathogenic coronavirus, only a purified, Infectious cDNA clone. Lab leak yes, but not the kind they now want to make us believe. They said it was a conspiracy theory, but now they WANT us to believe in it. Because it serves their narrative that calls for repeated lockdowns, masking and vaccine ID. In this presentation, he lays it all out:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1759454473
What about measles? Measles is a virus with respiratory transmission, and I understood its vaccine was very effective? Single dose, good for a lifetime?
I do like and enjoy your posts Dr. Huber! I am curious about this subject. Near the end, you wrote, "...all respiratory viruses, arrives to the upper airways first, and then to the lungs in natural infection. This is where antibodies might be useful, at the mucous membranes of the respiratory tract, where plasma cells produce secretory IgA antibodies, and at the alveolar epithelium". Again, I'm just curious, where are the "mucous membranes of the respiratory tract" located? Is this in the nose, the throat, mouth? Seems like a vaccine spray would be more useful. Anyways, keep up the good work. As always, educating me one tiny bit at a time.
Stunning. A game-changer.
ahem lay person here
how does the coronavirus get into the blood then if it's 100 nanometers... much larger than an antibody...?
and please don't say it uses an ace2 receptor coz it's still in a cell in the lung
Brian Mowrey recently covered the IgG antibody transudation controversy here:
https://unglossed.substack.com/p/efficacy-by-procrastination
I do like and enjoy your posts Dr. Huber!
It's because there are no pathogenic, transmissible 'viruses', that's why..
Jeez, people.. don't you get it already?