Over 300 cited publicly-released pages from governments in Europe and North America and peer-reviewed studies show evidence against safety and against efficacy of the COVID vaccines.
Thank you for being a doctor who remains uncorrupted and speaks the truth. It means so much to us folks who are horrified by the capture of almost all physicians...and the corporate media.
Thank you for writing information that will help end this crazy time in history.
I too am forever against shoes, I mean amazon, and if you have plans to publish through other sources I may wait the week or two. If not, like on election day, I may just hold my nose and click "buy".
I no longer buy Kindle books (or Prime movies) because it turns out you are only leasing them. If you ever delete your Amazon account, you will lose them. I did order the paperback. Amazon can’t later take it away from me.
I want to thank you for both of your new books. I appreciate all of the hard work and research you have blessed us with! Your writings are a MUST read for all who want the truth!!
Great book, accumulates a lot of evidence. Yet, the authorities still demand we take the vax, and refuse to investigate the apparent crimes against humanity. What do you think it will take to convince them? Lots of correlations, but we're all taught that correlation Is not causation. It's what criminal courts would call circumstantial evidence. In chapter 3, the Bradford Hill criteria for determining causality says item 6, biological plausibility is theorized. Seems pretty important that we prove those theories. There must be someone somewhere with the resources to do that. Until we do, or until we change the governments that are demanding it, the vax will keep on coming.
Bradford Hill is the most accepted tool in epidemiology to test for causation between variables that are assumed to be merely correlated before the BH criteria are satisfied. Criterion #6, biological plausibility, is always going to be merely theorized, no matter the circumstances. It's only biologically plausible that the bone was crushed when the car ran over it, due to physical stressors exceeding the strength of the bone at the point of maximum pressure, underneath tire track marks. That plausibility cannot of itself sever all of the ties of causality, for simply being a plausible hypothesis. The theoretical feature of plausibility does not mean that Bradford Hill criteria must be thrown out as the best tool we have for establishing cause and effect. I would also argue that the two strongest of those criteria for establishing causality are dose-dependence and tight temporal association, which we clearly have in the case of these vaccines. Also, strength of association and consistency are strongly upheld. So at this point, I would venture to say: Quod erat demonstratum (QED).
But the authorities say, not enough evidence. We can measure the damage from a crushed bone, and the tire tracks. Nobody has measured the damage from spike proteins. Some are unaffected, some die. Why different? Dose dependent? Victims defective? Is there a test to identify the degree of risk in an individual? They'll continue pushing the vax as long as it works. It stops working when they're forced to. That requires litigation with sufficient evidence to convince a court of the crime, or sufficient marketing to convince the public. You and Bradford Hill say it's risky and ineffective, CDC and NIH and WHO etc say it's safe and effective. You need a better argument or a better lawyer. Being right isn't good enough. Proving you're right, to the right people, is how we win.
Colleen, Amazon offers this book as part of Kindle unlimited service. But also offers it for a few bucks -- under the question, "Want to buy?" Which way benefits you more? How much, if any, $ do you see when we buy rather than use the unlimited service? I ask because it is my intention to benefit you the most possible. Cheers.
Thank you. Either way is about the same, zero vs one dollar royalty on the e-book, but my goal is to just get this out there, so if you know a misguided parent who is thinking of having this irreversible shot inflicted on their child, that's who to share it with please.
Thank you for being a doctor who remains uncorrupted and speaks the truth. It means so much to us folks who are horrified by the capture of almost all physicians...and the corporate media.
Agreed, Amazon is the fastest way to get your book out there! Do you have any plans for Barnes & Noble and a NOOK book?
That's the next project, likely a week or more out.
I just ordered the paperback and saw that the Kindle edition is available now too. I may order that as well.
I usually get both. Ebook for traveling, paper for reading in evenings, when I try to minimize screen viewing.
Thank you for writing information that will help end this crazy time in history.
I too am forever against shoes, I mean amazon, and if you have plans to publish through other sources I may wait the week or two. If not, like on election day, I may just hold my nose and click "buy".
Thanks. Just ordered a copy.
Thanks for writing and documenting history.
I no longer buy Kindle books (or Prime movies) because it turns out you are only leasing them. If you ever delete your Amazon account, you will lose them. I did order the paperback. Amazon can’t later take it away from me.
Avoiding Amazon Always, I use Alibris, often cheaper anyway.
Ordered your book. Thank you!
I want to thank you for both of your new books. I appreciate all of the hard work and research you have blessed us with! Your writings are a MUST read for all who want the truth!!
Thank you, Jerry.
Great book, accumulates a lot of evidence. Yet, the authorities still demand we take the vax, and refuse to investigate the apparent crimes against humanity. What do you think it will take to convince them? Lots of correlations, but we're all taught that correlation Is not causation. It's what criminal courts would call circumstantial evidence. In chapter 3, the Bradford Hill criteria for determining causality says item 6, biological plausibility is theorized. Seems pretty important that we prove those theories. There must be someone somewhere with the resources to do that. Until we do, or until we change the governments that are demanding it, the vax will keep on coming.
Bradford Hill is the most accepted tool in epidemiology to test for causation between variables that are assumed to be merely correlated before the BH criteria are satisfied. Criterion #6, biological plausibility, is always going to be merely theorized, no matter the circumstances. It's only biologically plausible that the bone was crushed when the car ran over it, due to physical stressors exceeding the strength of the bone at the point of maximum pressure, underneath tire track marks. That plausibility cannot of itself sever all of the ties of causality, for simply being a plausible hypothesis. The theoretical feature of plausibility does not mean that Bradford Hill criteria must be thrown out as the best tool we have for establishing cause and effect. I would also argue that the two strongest of those criteria for establishing causality are dose-dependence and tight temporal association, which we clearly have in the case of these vaccines. Also, strength of association and consistency are strongly upheld. So at this point, I would venture to say: Quod erat demonstratum (QED).
But the authorities say, not enough evidence. We can measure the damage from a crushed bone, and the tire tracks. Nobody has measured the damage from spike proteins. Some are unaffected, some die. Why different? Dose dependent? Victims defective? Is there a test to identify the degree of risk in an individual? They'll continue pushing the vax as long as it works. It stops working when they're forced to. That requires litigation with sufficient evidence to convince a court of the crime, or sufficient marketing to convince the public. You and Bradford Hill say it's risky and ineffective, CDC and NIH and WHO etc say it's safe and effective. You need a better argument or a better lawyer. Being right isn't good enough. Proving you're right, to the right people, is how we win.
Thanks.
I've sent this link off to about 100 Australian politicians.
Congratulations! Such a big accomplishment and saving so many lives!
You're right next to Bill Gates on the Best Sellers!! LOL
https://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/227695/ref=pd_zg_hrsr_books
Only the Forensic Medicine sub-category, quite a small and nerdy one, admittedly.
I was able to get it on Kindle Unlimited
Colleen, Amazon offers this book as part of Kindle unlimited service. But also offers it for a few bucks -- under the question, "Want to buy?" Which way benefits you more? How much, if any, $ do you see when we buy rather than use the unlimited service? I ask because it is my intention to benefit you the most possible. Cheers.
Thank you. Either way is about the same, zero vs one dollar royalty on the e-book, but my goal is to just get this out there, so if you know a misguided parent who is thinking of having this irreversible shot inflicted on their child, that's who to share it with please.
Thank you--just purchased!!