I'm a big fan of your writing. I'm also a fan of Dr. Malone.
I think you misunderstood his point. There are lots of accurate and powerful claims in the movie Died Suddenly. The blood clot evidence is especially powerful and unarguable.
Unfortunately there are also claims which are not proven by the evidence. Evidently this includes vi…
I'm a big fan of your writing. I'm also a fan of Dr. Malone.
I think you misunderstood his point. There are lots of accurate and powerful claims in the movie Died Suddenly. The blood clot evidence is especially powerful and unarguable.
Unfortunately there are also claims which are not proven by the evidence. Evidently this includes videos of people who didn't actually die (just collapsed) or who hadn't been vaccinated.
The problem is that any inclusion of a claim which cannot be proven allows the whole movie to dismissed as junk by the powers that be even though it may be wrong on only one claim out of 100. Malone says in his post, and I agree, the movie would be much more powerful if only the provable claims were included. Edit out the unproven claims and videos of victims that aren't known to have been vaccinated. A shorter movie would be easier to get someone to watch anyway.
I had wanted to use it to convince other people about the problems with the clot shots. Unfortunately I can't because as soon as they find out one of the claims is false they'll dismiss it outright and my credibility will be damaged.
I appreciate that concern. I understood as the footage of collapses occurred that not all had necessarily died. Was that explicitly said? Caveats need not always be declared unless a specific false statement or implication is made. I would like to see evidence that one of those who collapsed had not been vaccinated. It is too easy for Malone to make the unsubstantiated claims that he did. His argument would have been stronger if he had shown exactly where a false statement was made.
It would be important for me to know if any of the cadavers were unvaccinated. My suspicion is that not only the injection, but the virus itself was a bioweapon.
It wasn't stated in Stew's video, but elsewhere the embalmers have explained they didn't begin seeing the fibrous clots until AFTER the vaccine rollout began ~ and, to the best of their knowledge, they have not seen ANY such clots in the unvaccinated:
It is a big problem that we don't get to know the vaxx history or outcomes of their autopsies if they get one. The irony is the evil ones had no problem demanding to know our vaxx status.
All we can do is use common sense and translate. If they are young and drop, I have to assume it is vaxx related. The older folks are harder to distinguish, but I have to say it is a genius part of their evil plan because the elderly die, it is what they do. Question is, were they vaxx'd and did they die before their time? I think many have. Too many are dying in their 40's-60's range. That is not normal. Read church prayer requests, they can be mind blowing.
Before Covid I had a blood clot, two actually, one was doctor induced. I am still having lots of trouble w/the one leg that had the clot, and of course there is no idea of why. Since the vaxx come out I have had two ultrasounds post clot. The ultrasound techs very carefully professionally pry why I had the clot. I can read between their lines, and when I say no I have not had the vaxxine there is a big change in their bodies and faces. They know what is going on. Many had to get the vaxx to keep their jobs, they are doing their own private calculations, it has to be scary for them. Point being not every blood clot or heart problem is vaxxine related.
Same w/the mammo techs, they are looking for lymphoma and they outright ask if you have had the vaxx and immediately say "it is ok if you haven't, but we have seen an increase in lymph node swelling and we just want to check".
Not wanting to debate , but seems his attack seemed elitest and disdainful, for instance his comment about Peters being a bounty hunter. Having said that, it would be wise for Peters to edit documentable errors.
I'm a big fan of your writing. I'm also a fan of Dr. Malone.
I think you misunderstood his point. There are lots of accurate and powerful claims in the movie Died Suddenly. The blood clot evidence is especially powerful and unarguable.
Unfortunately there are also claims which are not proven by the evidence. Evidently this includes videos of people who didn't actually die (just collapsed) or who hadn't been vaccinated.
The problem is that any inclusion of a claim which cannot be proven allows the whole movie to dismissed as junk by the powers that be even though it may be wrong on only one claim out of 100. Malone says in his post, and I agree, the movie would be much more powerful if only the provable claims were included. Edit out the unproven claims and videos of victims that aren't known to have been vaccinated. A shorter movie would be easier to get someone to watch anyway.
I had wanted to use it to convince other people about the problems with the clot shots. Unfortunately I can't because as soon as they find out one of the claims is false they'll dismiss it outright and my credibility will be damaged.
I appreciate that concern. I understood as the footage of collapses occurred that not all had necessarily died. Was that explicitly said? Caveats need not always be declared unless a specific false statement or implication is made. I would like to see evidence that one of those who collapsed had not been vaccinated. It is too easy for Malone to make the unsubstantiated claims that he did. His argument would have been stronger if he had shown exactly where a false statement was made.
It would be important for me to know if any of the cadavers were unvaccinated. My suspicion is that not only the injection, but the virus itself was a bioweapon.
It wasn't stated in Stew's video, but elsewhere the embalmers have explained they didn't begin seeing the fibrous clots until AFTER the vaccine rollout began ~ and, to the best of their knowledge, they have not seen ANY such clots in the unvaccinated:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/d648a65bf7c4
I think the vaxx was created first, then the Covid virus as an excuse to use the vaxxine, so yes, bioweapons.
It is a big problem that we don't get to know the vaxx history or outcomes of their autopsies if they get one. The irony is the evil ones had no problem demanding to know our vaxx status.
All we can do is use common sense and translate. If they are young and drop, I have to assume it is vaxx related. The older folks are harder to distinguish, but I have to say it is a genius part of their evil plan because the elderly die, it is what they do. Question is, were they vaxx'd and did they die before their time? I think many have. Too many are dying in their 40's-60's range. That is not normal. Read church prayer requests, they can be mind blowing.
Before Covid I had a blood clot, two actually, one was doctor induced. I am still having lots of trouble w/the one leg that had the clot, and of course there is no idea of why. Since the vaxx come out I have had two ultrasounds post clot. The ultrasound techs very carefully professionally pry why I had the clot. I can read between their lines, and when I say no I have not had the vaxxine there is a big change in their bodies and faces. They know what is going on. Many had to get the vaxx to keep their jobs, they are doing their own private calculations, it has to be scary for them. Point being not every blood clot or heart problem is vaxxine related.
Same w/the mammo techs, they are looking for lymphoma and they outright ask if you have had the vaxx and immediately say "it is ok if you haven't, but we have seen an increase in lymph node swelling and we just want to check".
Thank you, @Richard Cabot ~ You expressed my own feelings and concerns beautifully.
For those who are interested, specific issues with the video are detailed in several other Substack articles:
> https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/back-up-for-died-suddenly/comment/10765049
Not wanting to debate , but seems his attack seemed elitest and disdainful, for instance his comment about Peters being a bounty hunter. Having said that, it would be wise for Peters to edit documentable errors.