"I still dont get your animus to my question of where to catch up"
Hilarious distortion of the exchange where you characterize my citation of Crawford's DMED as "a misguided attack" go read your comment. You didn't ask for any reference but I supplied it in my first reply.
To follow up with a passive aggressive jab about "smart people who …
"I still dont get your animus to my question of where to catch up"
Hilarious distortion of the exchange where you characterize my citation of Crawford's DMED as "a misguided attack" go read your comment. You didn't ask for any reference but I supplied it in my first reply.
To follow up with a passive aggressive jab about "smart people who get things" is an absurd way to make you a victim; there's ample examples of my challenges and confusion with math elements in Mathew's Substack comments but seems easier to bestow me with superior intellect than accept you made an error.
Thanks I always a fab day; life is short it's the only way to go! :~)
"I still dont get your animus to my question of where to catch up"
Hilarious distortion of the exchange where you characterize my citation of Crawford's DMED as "a misguided attack" go read your comment. You didn't ask for any reference but I supplied it in my first reply.
To follow up with a passive aggressive jab about "smart people who get things" is an absurd way to make you a victim; there's ample examples of my challenges and confusion with math elements in Mathew's Substack comments but seems easier to bestow me with superior intellect than accept you made an error.
Thanks I always a fab day; life is short it's the only way to go! :~)