I would also add, on the topic of snakes in the grass, look to Alex Berenson. Live broadcast to discuss censorship, specifically of Rogan. 1st question asked, he totally ignores & blindsides Malone with a vicious, unprovoked character attack, essentially calling
him a liar (his claim to have invented mRNA tech is "greatly exaggerated")…
I would also add, on the topic of snakes in the grass, look to Alex Berenson. Live broadcast to discuss censorship, specifically of Rogan. 1st question asked, he totally ignores & blindsides Malone with a vicious, unprovoked character attack, essentially calling
him a liar (his claim to have invented mRNA tech is "greatly exaggerated") & then falsely claims there is no evidence ivermectin works. Malone kept his cool, quickly described his credentials & why support for ivermectin.
Next day Malone spells out his creds (long list of papers & patents, with links) & calls Berenson "controlled opposition" on his substack.
Meanwhile, Berenson's substack is on fire from outraged former subscribers cancelling subscriptions & demanding an apology
So what does he do? Triples down on insulting Malone's character, on his substack ... at liberal rag Daily Beast.
My take: Berenson doesn't understand the science, can't analyze data, is in way over his head & out of his league.
So given the opportunity to sit with a great scientific mind, he attacked to try to throw Malone off balance & establish himself smarter & tougher to rebuild cred with his home crowd.
I would also add, on the topic of snakes in the grass, look to Alex Berenson. Live broadcast to discuss censorship, specifically of Rogan. 1st question asked, he totally ignores & blindsides Malone with a vicious, unprovoked character attack, essentially calling
him a liar (his claim to have invented mRNA tech is "greatly exaggerated") & then falsely claims there is no evidence ivermectin works. Malone kept his cool, quickly described his credentials & why support for ivermectin.
Next day Malone spells out his creds (long list of papers & patents, with links) & calls Berenson "controlled opposition" on his substack.
Meanwhile, Berenson's substack is on fire from outraged former subscribers cancelling subscriptions & demanding an apology
So what does he do? Triples down on insulting Malone's character, on his substack ... at liberal rag Daily Beast.
My take: Berenson doesn't understand the science, can't analyze data, is in way over his head & out of his league.
So given the opportunity to sit with a great scientific mind, he attacked to try to throw Malone off balance & establish himself smarter & tougher to rebuild cred with his home crowd.
Snake